Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33954872›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2021

Optimized PD-L1 scoring of gastric cancer.

Birgid Schoemig-Markiefka, Jana Eschbach, Andreas H Scheel, Aylin Pamuk, Josef Rueschoff, Thomas Zander, Reinhard Buettner, Wolfgang Schroeder, Christiane J Bruns, Heike Loeser and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Diagnostic discordance and treatment-associated change of PD-L1 and CLDN18.2 in gastric cancer: a real-world analysis of paired biopsy-resection samples.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Birgid Schoemig-Markiefka *Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Jana Eschbach *Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Andreas H ScheelInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Aylin PamukDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Josef RueschoffInstitute of Pathology Nordhessen, Kassel, Germany.
Thomas ZanderDepartment i of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Gastrointestinal Cancer Group Cologne GCGC, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Reinhard BuettnerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Wolfgang SchroederDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christiane J BrunsDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Heike LoeserInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Hakan Alakus *Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Alexander Quaas *Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. alexander.quaas@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3537-6011
University Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPD-1/PD-L1-Immunotherapy has been approved for gastric carcinoma. PD-L1 assessment by immunohistochemistry is the principle biomarker. Are biopsies able to map the actual PD-L1 status of the entire tumor?

methodsWhole tumor slides of 56 gastric carcinoma were analyzed to determine the distribution of PD-L1 positive cells in the entire tumor areas. Tissue micro arrays with four cores of the tumor surface, which represents the endoscopically accessible biopsy zone, were built from the same tumors. The PD-L1 CPS value was determined separately for each core. Preoperative diagnostic biopsies were available for 22 of the tumors. PD-L1 prevalence, sensitivity and specificity were analyzed using the whole tumor slides as reference scores. Molecular subtyping was performed and related to the PD-L1 status.

results27.3% of cases were PD-L1 negative (CPS < 1), 43.6% showed low PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥ 1 to < 5), 12.7% moderate (CPS ≥ 5 to < 10) and 16.4% strong expression (CPS ≥ 10). The biopsies showed best test characteristics if four surface biopsies were analyzed combined, i.e., the CPS was calculated across all four biopsies. The prevalence showed a distribution similar to the resection specimens, sensitivity was 0.73 and specificity 1.0. Using fewer surface biopsies decreased sensitivity and specificity and caused false-negative classifications. Compared to the TMAs, the preoperative biopsies showed reduced sensitivity (0.412).

conclusionsThis is the first comprehensive study to optimize PD-L1 assessment in gastric cancer using endoscopically available tissue. The obtained PD-L1 prevalence is consistent with data of current clinical studies. Calculation of the test characteristics shows that surface biopsies can be indicative of the true PD-L1 status based on the resection specimen. However, an adequate number of biopsies is required. In this study, n = 4 biopsies yielded best results.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyHumansImmunohistochemistryB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanBiomarkerBiopsiesCheckpoint inhibitionEndoscopically obtainedGastric cancerPD-L1

Identifiers

PMID33954872
PMCPMC8338825
OpenAlexW3158415488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.