Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33954821›Full record

ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on bone health among breast cancer patients. Does it require intervention?

Yadav Nisha, Biswajit Dubashi, Zachariah Bobby, Jaya Prakash Sahoo, Smita Kayal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Effect of chemotherapy and different chemotherapy regimens on bone health among Chinese breast cancer women in different menstrual status: a self-control study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yadav NishaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Biswajit DubashiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India. drbiswajitdm@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9852-2525
Zachariah BobbyDepartment of Biochemistry, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Jaya Prakash SahooDepartment of Endocrinology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Smita KayalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer (BC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Although the burden and mechanisms of endocrine therapy-related bone loss are known, the evidence is scanty regarding the impact of cytotoxic chemotherapy on bone health. We have attempted to summarize the effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on bone health in BC patients.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was performed via MEDLINE and Cochrane library databases to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy on bone health among women with BC. We included articles related to skeletal-related events, bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, osteoporosis-specific quality of life, bisphosphonate, and other bone-directed therapy. We excluded articles that included patients with metastatic breast cancer and patients receiving hormonal therapy. DISCUSSION: Bone microenvironment in cancer is directly or indirectly influenced by clinical, hormonal, nutritional, and treatment factors. Calcitonin, parathyroid hormone, calcitriol, and estrogen are the major hormonal regulators. Bone turnover markers, namely bone formation and resorption markers, have been used to predict bone loss, fracture risk, and monitoring treatment response. Chemotherapeutic drugs such as anthracyclines and taxanes synergistically affect BMD and quality of life. Calcium, vitamin D, bisphosphonates, and denosumab are supplemented to prevent excess bone resorption. Bone-targeted anti-resorptive agents have been studied as potential anticancer agents in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

conclusionThis review summarizes the negative effect of chemotherapy on bone health of BC patients and the importance of preventing or treating bone loss.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsBreast NeoplasmsBone DensityDiphosphonatesFemaleHumansQuality of LifeTumor MicroenvironmentBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesBone healthBone lossBone mineral densityBreast cancerChemotherapyQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID33954821
OpenAlexW3159754429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.