ArticleFrontiers in research metrics and analytics2021
Dimensional Taxonomy of Data Visualization: A Proposal From Communication Sciences Tackling Complexity.
Article in Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Scholarly Knowledge Graph-Powered Dashboard: Implementation and User Evaluation.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article consists of a conceptual analysis-from the perspective of communication sciences-of the relevant aspects that should be considered during operational steps in data visualization. The analysis is performed taking as a reference the components that integrate the communication framework theory-the message, the form, the encoder, the context, the channel, and the decoder-which correspond to six elements in the context of data visualization: content, graphic representation, encoding setup, graphic design and approach, media, and user. The study is focused accordingly on the dimensions that these elements describe: the degrees of abstraction of the information, the functionalities of the tool for the graphical representation, the specifications for the setup of the visualization, the approach modes to the context by the graphic design, the levels of communication efficiency in the media, and the requirements of the visualization perceived as values from the user experience side. The unfolding of these dimensions is undertaken following a common pattern of six organizational layers of complexity-basic, extended, synthetic, dynamic, interactive, and integrative-according to the analytical criteria. The results of the detailed study, based on an extensive scientific literature review, allow the design of a dimensional taxonomy of data visualization built on a matrix structure where these elements act as factors of completeness and the layers act as factors of complexity. As a conclusion, an object-centered model constituted by an ordered series of phases and achievements is proposed as a guide to complete a systematic process of data visualization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.