Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33954211›Full record

ArticleJournal of arthropod-borne diseases2020

Employing Different Traps for Collection of Mosquitoes and Detection of Dengue, Chikungunya and Zika Vector,

Jalil Nejati, Morteza Zaim, Hassan Vatandoost, Seyed Hassan Moosa-Kazemi, Rubén Bueno-Marí, Shahyad Azari-Hamidian, Mohammad Mehdi Sedaghat, Ahmad Ali Hanafi-Bojd, Mohammad Reza Yaghoobi-Ershadi, Hassan Okati-Aliabad and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arthropod-borne diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Spatiotemporal Patterns and Historical Overview ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Review
  3. Historical Overview of the Bionomics ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Entomological Surveillance System for InvasiveJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jalil NejatiHealth Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Morteza ZaimDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hassan VatandoostDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Hassan Moosa-KazemiDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Rubén Bueno-MaríDepartamento de Investigación y Desarrollo (I+D), Laboratorios Lokímica, Valencia, Spain.
Shahyad Azari-HamidianDepartment of Health Education, Research Center of Health and Environment, School of Health, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Mohammad Mehdi SedaghatDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad Ali Hanafi-BojdDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Reza Yaghoobi-ErshadiDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hassan Okati-AliabadHealth Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Francisco CollantesDepartment of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Ary A HoffmannBio21 Institute, Pest and Environmental Adaptation Group, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSoutheastern Iran has been established as an area with the potential to harbor Asian tiger mosquito populations

methodsFor this purpose, four adult mosquito traps (BG-sentinel 2, bednet, Malaise, and resting box trap) were used and their efficacy compared. In addition, large numbers of CDC ovitraps were employed, within 12 months.

resultsA total of 4878 adult samples including 22 species covering five genera were collected and identified from traps. It was not revealed any collection of

conclusionThe resulting data collected here on the efficiency of the various trap types can be useful for monitoring the densities of mosquito populations, which is an important component of a vector surveillance system. While the presence of

Indexed as

OvitrapSistan and BaluchistanStegomyia albopicta

Identifiers

PMID33954211
PMCPMC8053067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.