Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33954151›Full record

ReviewResearch and reports in urology2021

Choosing the Right Catheter for Pediatric Procedures: Patient Considerations and Preference.

Chad Crigger, Jake Kuzbel, Osama Al-Omar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research and reports in urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chad CriggerDepartment of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7127-4322
Jake KuzbelDepartment of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0014-1607
Osama Al-OmarDepartment of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8486-492X
West Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the need for bladder decompression and urinary diversion in the perioperative pediatric surgical patient can cause a clinical conundrum for the surgical team. Add in the several different types of urinary diversion devices possible, and the various materials associated therein and the process can suddenly seem unnecessarily daunting given the lack of concise recommendations and broad consensus. The decision to divert urine, though seemingly trivial, is associated with inherent risks. Managing and mitigating certain risks are best approached through proper education, selection, and technique. We provide a broad overview of pediatric catheter selection, indications, and pitfalls to streamline the process so that energy and attention can best be focused on the planned intervention at hand.

Indexed as

CAUTIpediatric surgerypediatric urologyquality improvementurinary diversion

Identifiers

PMID33954151
PMCPMC8092428
OpenAlexW3158743399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.