Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953965›Full record

ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2021

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant for Postoperative Macular Oedema Secondary to Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membrane and Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Guglielmo Parisi, Matteo Fallico, Teresio Avitabile, Antonio Longo, Elina Ortisi, Andrea Russo, Francesco Petrillo, Andrea Maugeri, Martina Barchitta, Vincenza Bonfiglio and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in Vitreoretinal Surgery: An Overview of the Literature.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Guglielmo ParisiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic Section, University of Turin, Turin 10122, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0795-618X
Matteo FallicoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania 95100, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2639-1321
Teresio AvitabileDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania 95100, Italy.
Antonio LongoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania 95100, Italy.
Elina OrtisiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania 95100, Italy.
Andrea RussoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania 95100, Italy.
Francesco PetrilloDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania 95100, Italy.
Andrea MaugeriDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Martina BarchittaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Vincenza BonfiglioDepartment of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Ophthalmology Section, University of Palermo, Palermo 90127, Italy.
Claudio FurinoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0254-7432
Gilda CennamoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Paolo CaselgrandiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic Section, University of Turin, Turin 10122, Italy.
Paola MaroloDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic Section, University of Turin, Turin 10122, Italy.
Luca VentreDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic Section, University of Turin, Turin 10122, Italy.
Michele ReibaldiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic Section, University of Turin, Turin 10122, Italy.
University of Catania · ITUniversity of Turin · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX) for the treatment of macular oedema secondary to vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane (ERM) and retinal detachment (RD) by conducting a systematic review with meta-analysis of published studies.

methodsStudies reporting clinical outcomes of DEX use for the treatment of macular oedema secondary to ERM and RD vitrectomy were searched on PubMed and Embase databases. The primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change between baseline and post-DEX treatment, reported as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Mean central macular thickness (CMT) change was assessed as a secondary outcome. Postimplant adverse events, including intraocular pressure rise and cataract development, were reported as well.

resultsFive uncontrolled studies, 1 nonrandomized controlled study, and 1 randomized controlled study were included, with a total of 5 cohorts and 3 cohorts in the ERM group and RD group, respectively. Considering the last available follow-up, a significant improvement in postimplant BCVA was found in the overall population, irrespective of the indication for vitrectomy (MD = -0.28, 95% CI = -0.37, -0.20;

conclusionThis meta-analysis showed that DEX yielded a significant improvement in visual and anatomical outcomes, even if limited by significant heterogeneity. Dexamethasone implant represents an effective treatment for postoperative macular oedema secondary to ERM and RD vitrectomy.

Identifiers

PMID33953965
PMCPMC8064798
OpenAlexW3154100543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.