ArticleToxicology research2014
Article in Toxicology research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- In silico evaluation of the anti Helicobacter pylori activity of selected bioactive compounds from Aloe vera.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anthraquinones and Aloe Vera Extracts as Potential Modulators of Inflammaging Mechanisms: A Translational Approach from Autoimmune to Onco-Hematological Diseases.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development of an LC-DAD-MS-Based Method for the Analysis of Hydroxyanthracene Derivatives in Food Supplements and Plant Materials.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Absence of genotoxicity of purifiedToxicology reports · 2021Article
- Detection of Loss of Heterozygosity in Tk-Deficient Mutants from L5178Y TkMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020Article
- Review
- Safety of hydroxyanthracene derivatives for use in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018Article
- Aloe vera: A review of toxicity and adverse clinical effects.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A 2-year cancer bioassay in rodents with a preparation of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.