Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953760›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent2021

Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the GAIN Short Screener Among Youth Utilizing Integrated Health Services.

Raymond Khanano, Skye Barbic, Joanna Henderson, Steve Mathias, Christopher G Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. What do justice-involved youth want from integrated youth services? A conjoint analysis.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Paying Attention to the Measures Used in Psychiatric Research and Services.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raymond KhananoUBC School of Population and Public Health (SPPH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Skye BarbicUBC Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Joanna HendersonMargaret and Wallace McCain Centre for Child, Youth and Family Mental Health, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario.
Steve MathiasFoundry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Christopher G RichardsonUBC School of Population and Public Health (SPPH), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is increasing interest in the identification of mental disorders among youth through routine screening in integrated health services. One tool currently being used in Canada is the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs Short Screener (GAIN-SS). The aims of this study were to (1) estimate the internal consistency of the GAIN-SS and its internalizing disorder screener (IDScr) (2) examine concurrent validity of the GAIN-SS and IDScr in an integrated youth health service centre, and (3) identify clinical cut-points for youth aged 17-24 years.

methodParticipants [n=201, gender=44% women, median age 21 (min,max: 17,24) years] were recruited from an integrated youth health service in Vancouver, British Columbia. Participants completed the GAIN-SS and three reference measures: Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). Cronbach's alpha, sensitivity, and specificity of the GAIN-SS and IDScr were examined using the K-10, PHQ-9 and GAD-7 as reference measures. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated to identify optimal cut-points for the GAIN-SS and IDScr.

resultsA cut-point of seven for the GAIN-SS optimized sensitivity (90%) and specificity (42%) with Cronbach's alpha of 0.91. A similar pattern of results was found for the IDScr and the reference measures it was tested against.

conclusionThe results indicate that the GAIN-SS and IDScr have acceptable sensitivity but poor specificity that could be improved via the optimal cut-points identified in this study. This low specificity may be acceptable within an integrated youth health service that provides follow-up diagnostic assessments by a clinician.

Indexed as

adolescentanxietydepressionmental healthprimary health caresensitivity and specificity

Identifiers

PMID33953760
PMCPMC8056962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.