Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953753›Full record

ReviewStem cells international2020

Mesenchymal Stem/Progenitor Cells: The Prospect of Human Clinical Translation.

Dina Rady, Marwa M S Abbass, Aiah A El-Rashidy, Sara El Moshy, Israa Ahmed Radwan, Christof E Dörfer, Karim M Fawzy El-Sayed

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Aging Cartilage Regeneration: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dina RadyOral Biology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9672-6935
Marwa M S AbbassOral Biology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6455-7516
Aiah A El-RashidyStem Cells and Tissue Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4475-0837
Sara El MoshyOral Biology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2860-8523
Israa Ahmed RadwanOral Biology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8262-5941
Christof E DörferClinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany.
Karim M Fawzy El-SayedStem Cells and Tissue Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6261-3609
Cairo University · EGChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells (MSCs) are key players in regenerative medicine, relying principally on their differentiation/regeneration potential, immunomodulatory properties, paracrine effects, and potent homing ability with minimal if any ethical concerns. Even though multiple preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated remarkable properties for MSCs, the clinical applicability of MSC-based therapies is still questionable. Several challenges exist that critically hinder a successful clinical translation of MSC-based therapies, including but not limited to heterogeneity of their populations, variability in their quality and quantity, donor-related factors, discrepancies in protocols for isolation, in vitro expansion and premodification, and variability in methods of cell delivery, dosing, and cell homing. Alterations of MSC viability, proliferation, properties, and/or function are also affected by various drugs and chemicals. Moreover, significant safety concerns exist due to possible teratogenic/neoplastic potential and transmission of infectious diseases. Through the current review, we aim to highlight the major challenges facing MSCs' human clinical translation and shed light on the undergoing strategies to overcome them.

Identifiers

PMID33953753
PMCPMC8063852
OpenAlexW3048635192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.