Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953738›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2021

Weighted-Attribute Triplet Hashing for Large-Scale Similar Judicial Case Matching.

Jiamin Li, Xingbo Liu, Xiushan Nie, Lele Ma, Peng Li, Kai Zhang, Yilong Yin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiamin LiSchool of Software, Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1123-7962
Xingbo LiuSchool of Software, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Xiushan NieSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, China.
Lele MaSchool of Software, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Peng LiShandong Liju Robot Technology Co., Ltd, Yantai, China.
Kai ZhangShandong Liju Robot Technology Co., Ltd, Yantai, China.
Yilong YinSchool of Software, Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8465-1294
Shandong University · CNWuhu Hit Robot Technology Research Institute · CNShandong Jianzhu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Similar judicial case matching aims to enable an accurate selection of a judicial document that is most similar to the target document from multiple candidates. The core of similar judicial case matching is to calculate the similarity between two fact case documents. Owing to similar judicial case matching techniques, legal professionals can promptly find and judge similar cases in a candidate set. These techniques can also benefit the development of judicial systems. However, the document of judicial cases not only is long in length but also has a certain degree of structural complexity. Meanwhile, a variety of judicial cases are also increasing rapidly; thus, it is difficult to find the document most similar to the target document in a large corpus. In this study, we present a novel similar judicial case matching model, which obtains the weight of judicial feature attributes based on hash learning and realizes fast similar matching by using a binary code. The proposed model extracts the judicial feature attributes vector using the bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) model and subsequently obtains the weighted judicial feature attributes through learning the hash function. We further impose triplet constraints to ensure that the similarity of judicial case data is well preserved when projected into the Hamming space. Comprehensive experimental results on public datasets show that the proposed method is superior in the task of similar judicial case matching and is suitable for large-scale similar judicial case matching.

Indexed as

Algorithms

Identifiers

PMID33953738
PMCPMC8064799
OpenAlexW3153800703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.