Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953674›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2021

Giloy Ghanvati (

Acharya Balkrishna, Lakshmipathi Khandrika, Anurag Varshney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. European journal of integrative medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Ayurvedic formulations: Potential COVID-19 therapeutics?Phytomedicine plus : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  11. Perspectives on nano-nutraceuticals to manage pre and post COVID-19 infections.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Article
  12. Deciphering the mechanism ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Acharya BalkrishnaDrug Discovery and Development Division, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar, India.
Lakshmipathi KhandrikaDrug Discovery and Development Division, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar, India.
Anurag VarshneyDrug Discovery and Development Division, Patanjali Research Institute, Haridwar, India.
Patanjali Research Foundation · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome disease caused by Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been a serious strain on the healthcare infrastructure mainly due to the lack of a reliable treatment option. Alternate therapies aimed at symptomatic relief are currently prescribed along with artificial ventilation to relieve distress. Traditional medicine in the form of Ayurveda has been used since ancient times as a holistic treatment option rather than targeted therapy. The practice of Ayurveda has several potent herbal alternatives for chronic cough, inflammation, and respiratory distress which are often seen in the SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this study we have used the aqueous extracts of

Indexed as

ayurvedgiloy ghanvatiinflamationSARS–CoV–2tinopsora cordifoliaviral diseasexenotranplantationzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID33953674
PMCPMC8091047
OpenAlexW3153134798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.