Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953654›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2021

Tomographic X-ray scattering based on invariant reconstruction: analysis of the 3D nanostructure of bovine bone.

Paolino De Falco, Richard Weinkamer, Wolfgang Wagermaier, Chenghao Li, Tim Snow, Nicholas J Terrill, Himadri S Gupta, Pawan Goyal, Martin Stoll, Peter Benner and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Small-angle scattering tensor tomography algorithm for robust reconstruction of complex textures.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Paolino De FalcoDepartment of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
Richard WeinkamerDepartment of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3858-9047
Wolfgang WagermaierDepartment of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4283-8464
Chenghao LiDepartment of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
Tim SnowDiamond Light Source Ltd, Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0DE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7146-6885
Nicholas J TerrillDiamond Light Source Ltd, Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0DE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8783-1282
Himadri S GuptaSchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
Pawan GoyalMax Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Sandtorstrasse 1, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Martin StollMax Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Sandtorstrasse 1, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Peter BennerMax Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Sandtorstrasse 1, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3362-4103
Peter FratzlDepartment of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4437-7830
Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces · DEDiamond Light Source · GBMax Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems · DEChemnitz University of Technology · DEQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R025673/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) is an effective characterization technique for multi-phase nanocomposites. The structural complexity and heterogeneity of biological materials require the development of new techniques for the 3D characterization of their hierarchical structures. Emerging SAXS tomographic methods allow reconstruction of the 3D scattering pattern in each voxel but are costly in terms of synchrotron measurement time and computer time. To address this problem, an approach has been developed based on the reconstruction of SAXS invariants to allow for fast 3D characterization of nanostructured inhomogeneous materials. SAXS invariants are scalars replacing the 3D scattering patterns in each voxel, thus simplifying the 6D reconstruction problem to several 3D ones. Standard procedures for tomographic reconstruction can be directly adapted for this problem. The procedure is demonstrated by determining the distribution of the nanometric bone mineral particle thickness (

Indexed as

bovine bonefibrolamellar bonefibrolamellar unitSAXSscattering tomographysmall-angle X-ray scatteringtomographyT parameter

Identifiers

PMID33953654
PMCPMC8056764
OpenAlexW3134813779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.