Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953629›Full record

ArticleAdolescent health, medicine and therapeutics2021

Virtual Consultations: Young People and Their Parents' Experience.

Stephanie Proulx-Cabana, Terry Yvonne Segal, Anna Gregorowski, Dougal Hargreaves, Halina Flannery

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Adolescent health, medicine and therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recent research in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: an evidence map.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of COVID-19 on primary care contacts with children and young people in England: longitudinal trends study 2015-2020.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie Proulx-CabanaPaediatric and Adolescent Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4756-7592
Terry Yvonne SegalPaediatric and Adolescent Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Anna GregorowskiPaediatric and Adolescent Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Dougal HargreavesPaediatric and Adolescent Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Halina FlanneryPaediatric and Adolescent Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvaluate the experience of virtual consultations for young people and their families and assess whether young people are being offered a confidential space as part of these virtual encounters. PATIENTS AND

methodsAn anonymous online survey was sent to young people age 10-18 y.o. who had experienced at least one virtual consultation with an adolescent medicine tertiary service in the United Kingdom between March 13th and June 13th 2020 mostly associated with, but not exclusively, management of chronic fatigue syndrome or medically unexplained symptoms. Responses from the survey were analysed by two authors who independently coded the common themes reported by the participants.

resultsFifty young people and their families participated in the survey. Eighty-eight percent reported feeling prepared for virtual appointments, 90% found them helpful, 88% felt that they were private and 86% reported they would find further virtual appointments helpful. Positive impacts reported were no need to travel (38%) and the continuity of care (36%). Many of our participants reported no negative impact (39%) and felt that nothing needed to be improved (56%). The most frequent improvement reported was the provision of a quality video call (34%). Only 36% of young people had the opportunity to speak in confidence to the health care provider without their parents' presence.

conclusionVirtual appointments are perceived as safe and helpful by the young people and their families. Professionals should offer a confidential remote space for young people to speak without their parents.

Indexed as

COVID-19remote consultationSARS-CoV-2telehealthtelemedicineyoung people

Identifiers

PMID33953629
PMCPMC8088977
OpenAlexW3159583212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.