Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953626›Full record

ArticleNature and science of sleep2021

Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea: Five-Year Safety and Efficacy Outcomes.

Maria Rosa Costanzo, Shahrokh Javaheri, Piotr Ponikowski, Olaf Oldenburg, Ralph Augostini, Lee R Goldberg, Christoph Stellbrink, Henrik Fox, Alan R Schwartz, Sanjaya Gupta and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01816776 (A Randomized Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the remedē® System in Patients With Central Sleep Apnea), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01816776 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the remedē® System in Patients With Central Sleep Apnea

TypeinterventionalSponsorRespicardia, Inc.Ran2013 to 2017Enrolled151ConditionsSleep Apnea, Central, Sleep Disordered Breathing, Heart FailureArmsTreatment Group (transvenous stimulation of the phrenic nerve), Control Group (Optimal Medical Therapy)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Classifying hypopneas as obstructive or central can enhance transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation therapy patient selection and outcomes.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Reply to "Usage is not efficacy in transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation for central sleep apnea".Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. 3-minute central apneas: enhanced expiratory rebreathing space to the rescue.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Insights, recommendations, and research priorities for central sleep apnea: report from an expert panel.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Novel Therapeutic Devices in Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria Rosa CostanzoAdvocate Heart Institute, Naperville, IL, USA.
Shahrokh JavaheriBethesda North Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Piotr PonikowskiDepartment of Heart Diseases, Medical University, Military Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland.
Olaf OldenburgLudgerus-Kliniken Münster, Clemens Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Ralph AugostiniThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Lee R GoldbergUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christoph StellbrinkBielefeld Medical Center, Bielefeld, Germany.
Henrik FoxClinic for General and Interventional Cardiology Angiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2187-8715
Alan R SchwartzUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9222-3751
Sanjaya GuptaUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Scott McKaneRespicardia, Inc., Minnetonka, MN, USA.
Timothy E MeyerRespicardia, Inc., Minnetonka, MN, USA.
William T AbrahamThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4805-1037
remedē®System Pivotal Trial Study Group
Coskata (United States) · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USAdvocate Heart Institute · USBethesda North Hospital · USClemenshospital Münster · DEHeart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia · DEKlinikum Bielefeld · DESaint Luke's Hospital · USWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

Lingual muscle control of upper airway patency in obstructive sleep apneaR01HL144859 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DEDHIA, RAJ C., SCHWARTZ, ALAN R. · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe remedē System Pivotal Trial was a prospective, multi-center, randomized trial demonstrating transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) therapy is safe and effectively treats central sleep apnea (CSA) and improves sleep architecture and daytime sleepiness. Subsequently, the remedē System was approved by FDA in 2017. As a condition of approval, the Post Approval Study (PAS) collected clinical evidence regarding long-term safety and effectiveness in adults with moderate to severe CSA through five years post implant.

methodsPatients remaining in the Pivotal Trial at the time of FDA approval were invited to enroll in the PAS and consented to undergo sleep studies (scored by a central laboratory), complete the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire to assess daytime sleepiness, and safety assessment. All subjects (treatment and former control group) receiving active therapy were pooled; data from both trials were combined for analysis.

resultsFifty-three of the original 151 Pivotal Trial patients consented to participate in the PAS and 52 completed the 5-year visit. Following TPNS therapy, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), central-apnea index (CAI), arousal index, oxygen desaturation index, and sleep architecture showed sustained improvements. Comparing 5 years to baseline, AHI and CAI decreased significantly (AHI baseline median 46 events/hour vs 17 at 5 years; CAI baseline median 23 events/hour vs 1 at 5 years), though residual hypopneas were present. In parallel, the arousal index, oxygen desaturation index and sleep architecture improved. The ESS improved by a statistically significant median reduction of 3 points at 5 years. Serious adverse events related to implant procedure, device or delivered therapy were reported by 14% of patients which include 16 (9%) patients who underwent a pulse generator reposition or lead revision (primarily in the first year). None of the events caused long-term harm. No unanticipated adverse device effects or related deaths occurred through 5 years.

conclusionLong-term TPNS safely improves CSA, sleep architecture and daytime sleepiness through 5 years post implant. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01816776.

Indexed as

central sleep apneaphrenic nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33953626
PMCPMC8092633
OpenAlexW3157808409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.