ArticleNature and science of sleep2021
Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea: Five-Year Safety and Efficacy Outcomes.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01816776 (A Randomized Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the remedē® System in Patients With Central Sleep Apnea), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the remedē® System in Patients With Central Sleep Apnea
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Classifying hypopneas as obstructive or central can enhance transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation therapy patient selection and outcomes.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Update on the Pathophysiology, Aetiology and Management of Central Sleep Apnoea.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Review
- Reply to "Usage is not efficacy in transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation for central sleep apnea".Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026Article
- The 2025 American Academy of Sleep Medicine Central Sleep Apnoea Guidelines and the Heart Failure Patient.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
- Non-positive Airway Pressure Therapies for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea and Central Sleep Apnoea.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
- [Central sleep apnea: cessation of central respiration control while we sleep : Suggestions for daily practice in diagnosis and therapy].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- 3-minute central apneas: enhanced expiratory rebreathing space to the rescue.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Recent advances in facilitating the translation of bioelectronic medicine therapies.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Insights, recommendations, and research priorities for central sleep apnea: report from an expert panel.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Article
- Revisiting Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Central Sleep Apnoea and Heart Failure: Emerging Innovations in Clinical Trials Analysis.Cardiac failure review · 2025Review
- Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Central Sleep Apnoea: When and Why?Cardiac failure review · 2025Review
- Phrenic nerve stimulation for central sleep apnea: a single institution experience.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Article
- Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation: setting up a clinical program.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Article
- Phrenic nerve stimulation for treatment of central sleep apnea.Frontiers in sleep · 2023Review
- Modern Approaches for the Treatment of Heart Failure: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Impact of Sleep-Disordered Breathing Treatment on Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Novel Therapeutic Devices in Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Central Sleep Apnea: Clinical and Billing Review.Chest · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe remedē System Pivotal Trial was a prospective, multi-center, randomized trial demonstrating transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) therapy is safe and effectively treats central sleep apnea (CSA) and improves sleep architecture and daytime sleepiness. Subsequently, the remedē System was approved by FDA in 2017. As a condition of approval, the Post Approval Study (PAS) collected clinical evidence regarding long-term safety and effectiveness in adults with moderate to severe CSA through five years post implant.
methodsPatients remaining in the Pivotal Trial at the time of FDA approval were invited to enroll in the PAS and consented to undergo sleep studies (scored by a central laboratory), complete the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire to assess daytime sleepiness, and safety assessment. All subjects (treatment and former control group) receiving active therapy were pooled; data from both trials were combined for analysis.
resultsFifty-three of the original 151 Pivotal Trial patients consented to participate in the PAS and 52 completed the 5-year visit. Following TPNS therapy, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), central-apnea index (CAI), arousal index, oxygen desaturation index, and sleep architecture showed sustained improvements. Comparing 5 years to baseline, AHI and CAI decreased significantly (AHI baseline median 46 events/hour vs 17 at 5 years; CAI baseline median 23 events/hour vs 1 at 5 years), though residual hypopneas were present. In parallel, the arousal index, oxygen desaturation index and sleep architecture improved. The ESS improved by a statistically significant median reduction of 3 points at 5 years. Serious adverse events related to implant procedure, device or delivered therapy were reported by 14% of patients which include 16 (9%) patients who underwent a pulse generator reposition or lead revision (primarily in the first year). None of the events caused long-term harm. No unanticipated adverse device effects or related deaths occurred through 5 years.
conclusionLong-term TPNS safely improves CSA, sleep architecture and daytime sleepiness through 5 years post implant. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01816776.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.