ArticleClinical interventions in aging2021
Age-Related Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from the COOL-AF Registry.
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Direct oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a decade-long nationwide retrospective cohort study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Impact of biological age versus chronological age on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the COOL-AF registry.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Asian Perspectives on Atrial Fibrillation Management: Lessons Learned From the COOL-AF Registry.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- 2025 Thai guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2025Article
- The COOL-AF Phase 2 Registry: COhort of Antithrombotic Use and Clinical Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients.JACC. Asia · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes and anticoagulation therapy in elderly non-valvular atrial fibrillation and heart failure patients.ESC heart failure · 2024Observational
- Time in target range of systolic blood pressure and clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients: results of the COOL-AF registry.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Three-year outcomes of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: the COOL-AF registry.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2023Article
- Predicting Heart Failure in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Report from the Prospective COOL-AF Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Non‑persistence to Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Elderly Patients with Non‑valvular Atrial Fibrillation.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to compare the rate of clinical outcomes among three age groups (<65, 65-74, and ≥75 years) of adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). PATIENTS AND
methodsWe prospectively enrolled NVAF patients from 27 Thailand medical centers. The following were collected at baseline: demographic data, risk factors, comorbid conditions, laboratory data, and medications. The clinical outcomes were ischemic stroke (IS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA), major bleeding (MB), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), heart failure (HF), and death. All events were adjudicated. Patients were categorized according to age group into three groups; age <65, 65-74, and ≥75 years.
resultsAmong the 3402 patients that were enrolled during 2014-2017, the mean age was 67.4±11.3 years, and 2073 (60.9%) were older. The average follow-up was 25.7±10.6 months. Oral anticoagulants were given in 75.4% of patients (91.1% of OAC was warfarin). The incidence rate of IS/TIA, MB, ICH, HF, and death was 1.43 (1.17-1.74), 2.11 (1.79-2.48), 0.70 (0.52-0.92), 3.03 (2.64-3.46), and 3.77 (3.33-4.24) per 100 person-years, respectively. The risk of IS/TIA, MB, ICH, HF, and death increased with age both before and after adjustment for potential confounders. Even though OAC reduced the risk of IS/TIA, it increased the risk of MB. Net clinical benefit (NCB) analysis favored oral anticoagulant (OAC) in the high-risk subset of older adults.
conclusionOlder adult NVAF patients had a significantly increased risk of IS/TIA, MB, ICH, HF, and death compared to younger NVAF before and after adjustment for potential confounders. Strategies to reduce overall risk, including OAC use and choice and integrated care, should be implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.