Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953531›Full record

ArticlePhysics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994)2021

Evaluating flow-field and expelled droplets in the mockup dental clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Xiujie Li, Cheuk Ming Mak, Kuen Wai Ma, Hai Ming Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Quantifying strategies to minimize aerosol dispersion in dental clinics.Experimental and computational multiphase flow · 2023
    Article
  4. Childhood Caries Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiujie LiDepartment of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8221-0279
Cheuk Ming MakDepartment of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9510-2071
Kuen Wai MaDepartment of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7784-0700
Hai Ming WongFaculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3411-6442

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the setting of widespread severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) community transmission, reducing the exposure risk on dental professionals and the next patients is the key to reopening dental services in this pandemic environment. The study is motivated by the lack of understanding of the flow-field characteristics and droplet distribution during aerosol-generating procedures. The particle image velocimetry measurements with high temporal and spatial resolutions were performed under ultrasonic scaling in the mockup experimental dental clinic. Compared with other methods focusing on the settled droplet particles, the study focused on the visualization of suspended droplets. From the results of the velocity vector and trajectory map, the high-level contaminated area will be within 1 m from the oral cavity. The vortex structures were identified by the vorticity index. In the surface near the patient's head, a counterclockwise vortex would carry some droplets and contaminate this region. The small droplets circulated in the turbulence cloud and the droplet nuclei generated by dehydration are the two primary sources of suspended particles, which may cause airborne transmission in the dental clinic. About 65%-74% of the droplets in ultrasonic scaling were in the range of 50-180

Identifiers

PMID33953531
PMCPMC8086643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.