Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953523›Full record

ArticleAdvances in neural information processing systems2020

Deep direct likelihood knockoffs.

Mukund Sudarshan, Wesley Tansey, Rajesh Ranganath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Survival Mixture Density Networks.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mukund SudarshanCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University.
Wesley TanseyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Rajesh RanganathCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Center for Data Science, New York University.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Deep probabilistic predictive models for stroke and coronary heart diseaseR01HL148248 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI RANGANATH, RAJESH · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive modeling often uses black box machine learning methods, such as deep neural networks, to achieve state-of-the-art performance. In scientific domains, the scientist often wishes to discover which features are actually important for making the predictions. These discoveries may lead to costly follow-up experiments and as such it is important that the error rate on discoveries is not too high. Model-X knockoffs [2] enable important features to be discovered with control of the false discovery rate (fdr). However, knockoffs require rich generative models capable of accurately modeling the knockoff features while ensuring they obey the so-called "swap" property. We develop Deep Direct Likelihood Knockoffs (ddlk), which directly minimizes the KL divergence implied by the knockoff swap property. ddlk consists of two stages: it first maximizes the explicit likelihood of the features, then minimizes the KL divergence between the joint distribution of features and knockoffs and any swap between them. To ensure that the generated knockoffs are valid under any possible swap, ddlk uses the Gumbel-Softmax trick to optimize the knockoff generator under the worst-case swap. We find ddlk has higher power than baselines while controlling the false discovery rate on a variety of synthetic and real benchmarks including a task involving a large dataset from one of the epicenters of COVID-19.

Identifiers

PMID33953523
PMCPMC8096517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.