Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953449›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2021

Public health policies and health-care workers' response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Thailand.

Natthaprang Nittayasoot, Rapeepong Suphanchaimat, Chawetsan Namwat, Patcharaporn Dejburum, Viroj Tangcharoensathien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. CHIVID: A Rapid Deployment of Community and Home Isolation During COVID-19 Pandemics.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The East-West Divide in Response to COVID-19.Engineering (Beijing, China) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natthaprang NittayasootDepartment of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rapeepong SuphanchaimatInternational Health Policy Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Tivanond Road, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Chawetsan NamwatDepartment of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patcharaporn DejburumDepartment of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Viroj TangcharoensathienInternational Health Policy Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Tivanond Road, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since January 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a far-reaching impact on global morbidity and mortality. The effects of varying degrees of implementation of public health and social measures between countries is evident in terms of widely differing disease burdens and levels of disruption to public health systems. Despite Thailand being the first country outside China to report a positive case of COVID-19, the subsequent number of cases and deaths has been much lower than in many other countries. As of 7 January 2021, the number of confirmed COVID-19-positive cases in Thailand was 9636 (138 per million population) and the number of deaths was 67 (1 per million population). We describe the nature of the health workforce and function that facilitated the capacity to respond to this pandemic. We also describe the public health policies (laboratory testing, test-and-trace system and mandatory 14-day quarantine of cases) and social interventions (daily briefings, restriction of mobility and social gatherings, and wearing of face masks) that allowed the virus to be successfully contained. To enhance the capacity of health-care workers to respond to the pandemic, the government (i) mobilized staff to meet the required surge capacity; (ii) developed and implemented policies to protect occupational safety; and (iii) initiated packages to support morale and well-being. The results of the policies that we describe are evident in the data: of the 66 countries with more than 100 COVID-19-positive cases in health-care workers as at 8 May 2020, Thailand ranked 65th.

Indexed as

Health PolicyCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresHealth PersonnelHumansMental HealthOccupational HealthPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Thailand

Identifiers

PMID33953449
PMCPMC8085624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.