Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953381›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2021

Plaque erosion and acute coronary syndromes: phenotype, molecular characteristics and future directions.

Akl C Fahed, Ik-Kyung Jang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Mechanical Thrombus Aspiration for a Young STEMI Patient With Plaque Erosion: Time for a Stent-Free Approach?Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pathogenesis of plaque erosion.Trends in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Coronary plaque healing: a safety net or a hazard indicator?Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Akl C FahedCardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ik-Kyung JangCardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. ijang@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5796-3006
Broad Institute · USHarvard University · US

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH TRAINING IN CARDIOLOGYT32HL007208 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Patrick Thomas Ellinor, David E Sosnovik · 1985 to 2026
$16.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain one of the leading causes of death, the clinical presentation has changed over the past three decades with a decline in the incidence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and an increase in non-STEMI. This epidemiological shift is at least partially explained by changes in plaque biology as a result of the widespread use of statins. Historically, atherosclerotic plaque rupture of the fibrous cap was thought to be the main culprit in ACS. However, plaque erosion with an intact fibrous cap is now responsible for about one third of ACS and up to two thirds of non-STEMI. Two major research approaches have enabled a better understanding of plaque erosion. First, advanced intravascular imaging has provided opportunities for an 'optical biopsy' and extensive phenotyping of coronary plaques in living patients. Second, basic science experiments have shed light on the unique molecular characteristics of plaque erosion. At present, patients with ACS are still uniformly treated with coronary stents irrespective of the underlying pathobiology. However, pilot studies indicate that patients with plaque erosion might be treated conservatively without coronary stenting. In this Review, we discuss the patient phenotype and the molecular characteristics in atherosclerotic plaque erosion and provide our vision for a potential major shift in the management of patients with plaque erosion.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromePlaque, AtheroscleroticHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID33953381
OpenAlexW3158591537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.