Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953364›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2021

Population dynamics of microbial cross-feeding are determined by co-localization probabilities and cooperation-independent cheater growth.

Rinke J van Tatenhove-Pel, Daan H de Groot, Anjani S Bisseswar, Bas Teusink, Herwig Bachmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Engineering an asymmetric cross-feeding consortium inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Spatial population dynamics of bacterial colonies with social antibiotic resistance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rinke J van Tatenhove-PelSystems Biology Lab, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1108, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8291-5823
Daan H de GrootSystems Biology Lab, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1108, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7070-8950
Anjani S BisseswarSystems Biology Lab, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1108, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas TeusinkSystems Biology Lab, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1108, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3929-0423
Herwig BachmannSystems Biology Lab, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1108, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.bachmann@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8224-0993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As natural selection acts on individual organisms the evolution of costly cooperation between microorganisms is an intriguing phenomenon. Introduction of spatial structure to privatize exchanged molecules can explain the evolution of cooperation. However, in many natural systems cells can also grow to low cell concentrations in the absence of these exchanged molecules, thus showing "cooperation-independent background growth". We here serially propagated a synthetic cross-feeding consortium of lactococci in the droplets of a water-in-oil emulsion, essentially mimicking group selection with varying founder population sizes. The results show that when the growth of cheaters completely depends on cooperators, cooperators outcompete cheaters. However, cheaters outcompete cooperators when they can independently grow to only ten percent of the consortium carrying capacity. This result is the consequence of a probabilistic effect, as low founder population sizes in droplets decrease the frequency of cooperator co-localization. Cooperator-enrichment can be recovered by increasing the founder population size in droplets to intermediate values. Together with mathematical modelling our results suggest that co-localization probabilities in a spatially structured environment leave a small window of opportunity for the evolution of cooperation between organisms that do not benefit from their cooperative trait when in isolation or form multispecies aggregates.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, BiologicalPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsProbability

Identifiers

PMID33953364
PMCPMC8443577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.