Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953329›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Cooperative root graft networks benefit mangrove trees under stress.

Alejandra G Vovides, Marie-Christin Wimmler, Falk Schrewe, Thorsten Balke, Martin Zwanzig, Cyril Piou, Etienne Delay, Jorge López-Portillo, Uta Berger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Alejandra G VovidesSchool of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK. Alejandra.Vovides@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-5770
Marie-Christin WimmlerInstitute of Forest Growth and Forest Computer Sciences, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-6764
Falk SchreweInstitute of Forest Growth and Forest Computer Sciences, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Thorsten BalkeSchool of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7733-5069
Martin ZwanzigInstitute of Forest Growth and Forest Computer Sciences, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1866-6743
Cyril PiouCIRAD, UMR CBGP, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRD, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9378-9404
Etienne DelayCIRAD, UR GREEN, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-6269
Jorge López-PortilloFunctional Ecology Network, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Veracruz, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6827-3297
Uta BergerInstitute of Forest Growth and Forest Computer Sciences, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Technische Universität Dresden · DECentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRUniversity of Glasgow · GBInstituto de Ecología · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of natural root grafts, the union of roots of the same or different trees, is common and shared across tree species. However, their significance for forest ecology remains little understood. While early research suggested negative effects of root grafting with the risk of pathogen transmission, recent evidence supports the hypothesis that it is an adaptive strategy that reduces stress by facilitating resource exchange. Here, by analysing mangrove root graft networks in a non-destructive way at stand level, we show further evidence of cooperation-associated benefits of root grafting. Grafted trees were found to dominate the upper canopy of the forest, and as the probability of grafting and the frequency of grafted groups increased with a higher environmental stress, the mean number of trees within grafted groups decreased. While trees do not actively 'choose' neighbours to graft to, our findings point to the existence of underlying mechanisms that regulate 'optimal group size' selection related to resource use within cooperating networks. This work calls for further studies to better understand tree interactions (i.e. network hydraulic redistribution) and their consequences for individual tree and forest stand resilience.

Indexed as

Stress, PhysiologicalPlant RootsRhizophoraceaeTrees

Identifiers

PMID33953329
PMCPMC8100114
OpenAlexW3159267453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.