ArticleScientific reports2021
Enabling exercise prescription for survivors of cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06987708 (Evaluating the Impact of a 12-month Multi-Modal Lifestyle Management Intervention on Disease Relevant Biomarkers Associated With Monoclonal Gammopathy of Unknown Significance), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating the Impact of a 12-month Multi-Modal Lifestyle Management Intervention on Disease Relevant Biomarkers Associated With Monoclonal Gammopathy of Unknown Significance (MGUS) and Smoldering Myeloma (SM): A Prospective Intervention Pilot Study
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- 'You've Given Me My Voice'-Enhancing Engagement in Exercise Oncology Research: A Patient and Public Involvement Approach to Co‑Designing a Pre‑Radiotherapy Exercise Programme With People Living With Lung Cancer.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Context Matters: Divergent Roles of Exercise-Induced and Tumor-Derived Lactate in Cancer.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Non-Cancer-Related Causes' Impact on Lung Cancer Survival: SEER Analysis.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Dietary niacin intake and mortality outcomes in hypertensive populations: analysis from NHANES 2003-2016.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- The Impact and Molecular Mechanisms of Exercise in Cancer Therapy.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Core reference ontology for individualized exercise prescription.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although exercise is widely recommended for survivors of cancer, readily implementable approaches for evaluating exercise tolerance enabling exercise prescriptions at appropriate levels of cardiovascular exertion are not always available. We evaluated the utility of modified Harvard Step tests within the context of a standard physical examination for fitness evaluation and exercise prescription for survivors of cancer across a range of age, BMI and exercise history. While 52% of presenting individuals with a past cancer diagnosis were able to complete a 3-min test at pace with a reduced 9-in. step, adoption of self-determined pacing, test duration and completion on a flat surface enabled relative fitness rating and appropriate exercise prescription for the remaining survivors. Younger age and more vigorous exercise histories correlated with completion of the standard 3-min test at pace, but all 9-in. formats led to exercise prescriptions more vigorous than current activity. The physical examination setting expedited inclusion of core and specific muscle group strength testing. The approach is adaptable to a range of health care settings, providers, and patients, providing a shared opportunity for providers and patients to evaluate exercise tolerance. It can be used to further expand incorporation of exercise testing and prescription into routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.