Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953297›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

The use of spent coffee grounds and spent green tea leaves for the removal of cationic dyes from aqueous solutions.

Tomasz Jóźwiak, Urszula Filipkowska, Joanna Struk-Sokołowska, Kamil Bryszewski, Karol Trzciński, Joanna Kuźma, Monika Ślimkowska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Use of Chitin from the Molts of Mealworm (Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tomasz JóźwiakDepartment of Environmental Engineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Warszawska St. 117a, 10-957, Olsztyn, Poland. tomasz.jozwiak@uwm.edu.pl.
Urszula FilipkowskaDepartment of Environmental Engineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Warszawska St. 117a, 10-957, Olsztyn, Poland.
Joanna Struk-SokołowskaDepartment of Environmental Engineering Technology, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska St. 45E, 15-351, Bialystok, Poland.
Kamil BryszewskiDepartment of Environmental Engineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Warszawska St. 117a, 10-957, Olsztyn, Poland.
Karol TrzcińskiDepartment of Environmental Engineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Warszawska St. 117a, 10-957, Olsztyn, Poland.
Joanna KuźmaDepartment of Environmental Engineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Warszawska St. 117a, 10-957, Olsztyn, Poland.
Monika ŚlimkowskaDepartment of Environmental Engineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Warszawska St. 117a, 10-957, Olsztyn, Poland.
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PLBialystok University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to examine sorption effectiveness of cationic dyes: Basic Red 46 (BR46) and Basic Violet 10 (BV10) onto spent coffee ground (CG) and spent green tea leaves (GTL). The scope of the study included, i.a.: sorbent FTIR spectra analysis, determination of pH effect on dye sorption effectiveness, analysis of dye sorption kinetics, and determination of maximal sorption capacity of the sorbents. The effectiveness of BR46 sorption on the sorbents tested was the highest at pH 6 and that of BV10 at pH 3. Both sorbents caused changes in solution pH during the sorption process, due to the system tending to reach the pH value approximating the pH

Identifiers

PMID33953297
PMCPMC8100174
OpenAlexW3158774540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.