Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953290›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2021

T-cell-based immunotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia: current concepts and future developments.

Naval Daver, Ahmad S Alotaibi, Veit Bücklein, Marion Subklewe

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 169 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Phase 1 Study of KITE-222, an Autologous CLL-1-Directed CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Naval DaverDepartment of Leukemia, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. ndaver@mdanderson.org.
Ahmad S AlotaibiDepartment of Leukemia, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Veit BückleinDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marion SubkleweDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. marion.subklewe@med.uni-muenchen.de.
LMU Klinikum · DEKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer SPORE-LeukemiaP50CA100632 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHPALL, ELIZABETH J · 2003 to 2023
$43.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA100632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease linked to a broad spectrum of molecular alterations, and as such, long-term disease control requires multiple therapeutic approaches. Driven largely by an improved understanding and targeting of these molecular aberrations, AML treatment has rapidly evolved over the last 3-5 years. The stellar successes of immunotherapies that harness the power of T cells to treat solid tumors and an improved understanding of the immune systems of patients with hematologic malignancies have led to major efforts to develop immunotherapies for the treatment of patients with AML. Several immunotherapies that harness T cells against AML are in various stages of preclinical and clinical development. These include bispecific and dual antigen receptor-targeting antibodies (targeted to CD33, CD123, CLL-1, and others), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, and T-cell immune checkpoint inhibitors (including those targeting PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, and newer targets such as TIM3 and STING). The current and future directions of these T-cell-based immunotherapies in the treatment landscape of AML are discussed in this review.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID33953290
PMCPMC8257483
OpenAlexW3157227887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.