ArticleScientific reports2021
Determinants of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer's grayscale value in normal eyes by spectral domain optical coherence tomography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness profile in an Iranian adult population.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and its Ocular and Systemic Determinants in an Elderly Population: A Population-Based Study.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine and evaluate the distribution, variation, and determinants of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) grayscale value with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in normal eyes. In this cross-sectional study, three hundred ninety-seven normal eyes from 397 healthy Chinese adults aged 18-80 were consecutively recruited from a tertiary eye care center. An SD-OCT instrument took pRNFL imaging. We used a customized software to measure pRNFL parameters, including thickness and grayscale value. Univariable and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between pRNFL grayscale value with ocular (e.g., axial length [A.L.], spherical equivalent [S.E.], intraocular pressure [IOP]), and systemic (e.g., age, sex) factors. A total of 397 eyes from 397 healthy subjects were included in the final analysis with mean (± SD) age 44.63 ± 16.43 years (range 18-80 years) and 196 (49.4%) males. The mean average of pRNFL grayscale value and thickness 164.82 ± 5.69 and 106.68 ± 8.89 μm, respectively. pRNFL grayscale value in nasal sectors (163.26 ± 9.31) was significantly lower comparing those in all other five sectors (all with p < 0.001)]. In multivariable analysis, average pRNFL grayscale value was independently correlated to older age (β = - 0.053, p = 0.002), longer axial length (β = - 0.664, p = 0.003), lower RPE grayscale value (β = 0.372, p < 0.001) and lower ImageQ (β = 0.658, p < 0.001). In this study, we provided normative SD-OCT data on the pRNFL grayscale value profile in nonglaucomatous eyes. Lower average pRNFL grayscale value was independently correlated to older age, longer axial length, lower RPE grayscale value, and lower ImageQ. These determinants should be considered when interpreting pRNFL grayscale value in glaucoma assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.