Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953198›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Protein analysis of extracellular vesicles to monitor and predict therapeutic response in metastatic breast cancer.

Fei Tian, Shaohua Zhang, Chao Liu, Ziwei Han, Yuan Liu, Jinqi Deng, Yike Li, Xia Wu, Lili Cai, Lili Qin and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Fei Tian *Beijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, China.
Shaohua Zhang *Department of Breast Cancer, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3911-2398
Chao LiuBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, China. liuc@nanoctr.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3232-2974
Ziwei HanBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, China.
Yuan LiuBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, China.
Jinqi DengBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, China.
Yike LiBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, China.
Xia WuDepartment of Breast Cancer, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lili CaiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lili QinDepartment of Breast Cancer, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qinghua ChenBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, China.
Yang YuanDepartment of Breast Cancer, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yi LiuDepartment of Breast Cancer, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yulong CongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Baoquan DingBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1095-8872
Zefei JiangDepartment of Breast Cancer, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. jiangzefei@csco.org.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-4295-0173
Jiashu SunBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, China. sunjs@nanoctr.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4255-6202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular profiling of circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) provides a promising noninvasive means to diagnose, monitor, and predict the course of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the analysis of EV protein markers has been confounded by the presence of soluble protein counterparts in peripheral blood. Here we use a rapid, sensitive, and low-cost thermophoretic aptasensor (TAS) to profile cancer-associated protein profiles of plasma EVs without the interference of soluble proteins. We show that the EV signature (a weighted sum of eight EV protein markers) has a high accuracy (91.1 %) for discrimination of MBC, non-metastatic breast cancer (NMBC), and healthy donors (HD). For MBC patients undergoing therapies, the EV signature can accurately monitor the treatment response across the training, validation, and prospective cohorts, and serve as an independent prognostic factor for progression free survival in MBC patients. Together, this work highlights the potential clinical utility of EVs in management of MBC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorExtracellular VesiclesFemaleHumansPlatelet Membrane Glycoprotein IIbProspective StudiesSurvival RateTetraspanin 30Biomarkers, TumorPlatelet Membrane Glycoprotein IIbTetraspanin 30

Identifiers

PMID33953198
PMCPMC8100127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.