Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33952628›Full record

Observational studyArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2021

Administration of parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia: a population level observational study using routinely collected data held in the National Neonatal Research Database.

Chris Gale, Dusha Jeyakumaran, Nicholas Longford, Cheryl Battersby, Shalini Ojha, Kayleigh Oughham, Jon Dorling

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03278847 (Optimising Newborn Nutrition During Therapeutic Hypothermia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03278847 completednot on this map

Optimising Newborn Nutrition During Therapeutic Hypothermia: an Observational Study Using Routinely Collected Data

TypeobservationalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2010 to 2021Enrolled6,030ConditionsInfant, Newborn, Asphyxia Neonatorum, Hypothermia, Induced, Parenteral NutritionArmsReceived enteral (milk) feeds during therapeutic hypothermia, Enteral (milk) feeds withheld during therapeutic hypothermia, Received parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia, Did not receive parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chris GaleNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK christopher.gale@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0707-876X
Dusha JeyakumaranNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nicholas LongfordNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Cheryl BattersbyNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Shalini OjhaSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5668-4227
Kayleigh OughhamNeonatal Data Analysis Unit, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK.
Jon DorlingDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Dalhousie University-Faculty of Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Faculty of Public Health · GBDalhousie University · CAImperial College London · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParenteral nutrition is commonly administered during therapeutic hypothermia. Randomised trials in critically ill children indicate that parenteral nutrition may be harmful.

objectiveTo examine the association between parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia and clinically important outcomes.

designRetrospective, population-based cohort study using the National Neonatal Research Database; propensity scores were used to create matched groups for comparison.

settingNational Health Service neonatal units in England, Scotland and Wales.

participants6030 term and near-term babies, born 1/1/2010 and 31/12/2017, who received therapeutic hypothermia; 2480 babies in the matched analysis. EXPOSURE: We compared babies that received any parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia with babies that did not.

main outcome measuresPrimary outcome: blood culture confirmed late-onset infection; secondary outcomes: treatment for late onset infection, necrotising enterocolitis, survival, length of stay, measures of breast feeding, hypoglycaemia, central line days, time to full enteral feeds, discharge weight.

results1475/6030 babies (25%) received parenteral nutrition. In comparative matched analyses, the rate of culture positive late onset infection was higher in babies that received parenteral nutrition (0.3% vs 0.9%; difference 0.6; 95% CI 0.1, 1.2; p=0.03), but treatment for presumed infection was not (difference 0.8%, 95% CI -2.1 to 3.6, p=0.61). Survival was higher in babies that received parenteral nutrition (93.1% vs 90.0%; rate difference 3.1, 95% CI 1.5, 4.7; p<0.001).

conclusionsReceipt of parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia is associated with higher late-onset infection but lower mortality. This finding may be explained by residual confounding. Research should address the risks and benefits of parenteral nutrition in this population.

Indexed as

Hypothermia, InducedInfant, PrematureParenteral NutritionCombined Modality TherapyEnterocolitis, NecrotizingFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornLength of StayMaleOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesRoutinely Collected Health DataSepsisSurvival Analysisepidemiologyneonatologystatistics

Identifiers

PMID33952628
PMCPMC8543212
OpenAlexW3157903125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.