Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33952540›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2021

Cross-sectoral communication by bringing together patient with cancer, general practitioner and oncologist in a video-based consultation: a qualitative study of oncologists' and nurse specialists' perspectives.

Dorte Gilså Hansen, Theis Bitz Trabjerg, Jeffrey James Sisler, Jens Søndergaard, Lars Henrik Jensen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02716168 (Partnership-Project - Reinforcing Partnership Between Cancer Patient, General Practitioner and Oncologist During Chemotherapy - a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02716168 nacompletednot on this map

Partnership-Project - Reinforcing Partnership Between Cancer Patient, General Practitioner and Oncologist During Chemotherapy - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern DenmarkRan2016 to 2020Enrolled281ConditionsCancerArmsShared video consultation between patient, general practitioner and oncologist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hospitalisation at Home of Patients with COVID-19: A Qualitative Study of User Experiences.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorte Gilså HansenResearch Unit for General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark dorte.gilsa.hansen@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-5946-9968
Theis Bitz TrabjergResearch Unit for General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7632-8227
Jeffrey James SislerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Jens SøndergaardResearch Unit for General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1629-1864
Lars Henrik JensenInstitute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0020-1537
University of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared care models in the field of cancer aim to improve care coordination, role clarification and patient satisfaction. Cross-sectoral communication is pivotal. Involvement of patients may add to intended mechanisms.A randomised controlled trial 'The Partnership Study' tested the effect of bringing together patient, general practitioner (GP) and oncologist for a consultation conducted by video. PURPOSE: As part of the process evaluation, this study aimed to explore experiences, attitudes and perspectives of the oncological department on sharing patient consultations with GPs using video.

methodsFour semistructured interviews with five oncologists and four nurse specialists were conducted in February 2020. We focused on the informants' experiences and reflections on the potential of future implementation of the concept 'inviting the GP for a shared consultation by video'. The analyses were based on an inductive, open-minded, hermeneutic phenomenological approach.

resultsA total of six overall themes were identified: structuring consultation and communication, perceptions of GP involvement in cancer care, stressors, making a difference, alternative ways of cross-sector communication and needs for redesigning the model. The concept made sense and was deemed useful, but solving the many technical and organisational problems is pivotal. Case-specific tasks and relational issues were targeted by pragmatically rethinking protocol expectations and the usual way of communication and structuring patient encounters. Case selection was discussed as one way of maturing the concept.

conclusionThis Danish study adds new insight into understanding different aspects of the process, causal mechanisms as well as the potential of future implementation of video-based tripartite encounters. Beyond solving the technical problems, case selection and organisational issues are important. Acknowledging the disruption of the usual workflow, the introduction of new phases of the usual encounter and the variety of patient-GP relationships to be embraced may help to better understand and comply with barriers and facilitators of communication and sharing. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02716168.

Indexed as

General PractitionersNeoplasmsNurse SpecialistsOncologistsCommunicationHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchReferral and Consultationadult oncologyprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID33952540
PMCPMC8103367
OpenAlexW3159281794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.