Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33952519›Full record

ArticleScience advances2021

In situ cancer vaccination using lipidoid nanoparticles.

Jinjin Chen, Min Qiu, Zhongfeng Ye, Thomas Nyalile, Yamin Li, Zachary Glass, Xuewei Zhao, Liu Yang, Jianzhu Chen, Qiaobing Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Biomaterial-Based In Situ Cancer Vaccines.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024
    Review
  20. Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinjin ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA 02155, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3386-5321
Min QiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA 02155, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7373-2355
Zhongfeng YeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA 02155, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8578-5166
Thomas NyalileDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA 02155, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0899-0021
Yamin LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA 02155, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5535-1807
Zachary GlassDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA 02155, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2114-8739
Xuewei ZhaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA 02155, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2658-5604
Liu YangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA 02155, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7886-3362
Jianzhu ChenKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research and Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5687-6154
Qiaobing XuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA 02155, USA. qiaobing.xu@tufts.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7323-7795
Tufts University · US

Funding

ROS-responsive Chemical Modification of Protein and Its DeliveryR01EB027170 · NIBIB · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI XU, QIAOBING · 2018 to 2022
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In situ vaccination is a promising strategy for cancer immunotherapy owing to its convenience and the ability to induce numerous tumor antigens. However, the advancement of in situ vaccination techniques has been hindered by low cross-presentation of tumor antigens and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. To balance the safety and efficacy of in situ vaccination, we designed a lipidoid nanoparticle (LNP) to achieve simultaneously enhancing cross-presentation and STING activation. From combinatorial library screening, we identified 93-O17S-F, which promotes both the cross-presentation of tumor antigens and the intracellular delivery of cGAMP (STING agonist). Intratumor injection of 93-O17S-F/cGAMP in combination with pretreatment with doxorubicin exhibited excellent antitumor efficacy, with 35% of mice exhibiting total recovery from a primary B16F10 tumor and 71% of mice with a complete recovery from a subsequent challenge, indicating the induction of an immune memory against the tumor. This study provides a promising strategy for in situ cancer vaccination.

Identifiers

PMID33952519
PMCPMC8099179
OpenAlexW3157764908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.