Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33952367›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2021

Victimisation of individuals with serious mental illness living in sheltered housing: differential impact of risk factors related to clinical and demographic characteristics.

Milan Zarchev, Cornelis L Mulder, Jens Henrichs, Diana P K Roeg, Stefan Bogaerts, Jaap van Weeghel, Astrid M Kamperman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Milan ZarchevDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-8566
Cornelis L MulderDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1038-9211
Jens HenrichsDepartment of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-4060
Diana P K RoegResearch Division, Kwintes Supported Housing The Netherlands; and Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4431-7889
Stefan BogaertsDepartment of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3776-3792
Jaap van WeeghelTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8537-6167
Astrid M KampermanDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4455-6492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSheltered housing is associated with quality-of-life improvements for individuals with serious mental illness (SMI). However, there are equivocal findings around safety outcomes related to this type of living condition.

aimsWe aimed to investigate raw differences in prevalence and incidence of crime victimisation in sheltered housing compared with living alone or with family; and to identify groups at high risk for victimisation, using demographic and clinical factors. We do so by reporting estimated victimisation incidents for each risk group.

methodA large, community-based, cross-sectional survey of 956 people with SMI completed the Dutch Crime and Victimisation Survey. Data was collected on victimisation prevalence and number of incidents in the past year.

resultsVictimisation prevalence was highest among residents in sheltered housing (50.8%) compared with persons living alone (43%) or with family (37.8%). We found that sheltered housing was associated with increased raw victimisation incidence (incidence rate ratio: 2.80, 95% CI 2.36-3.34 compared with living with family; 1.87, 95% CI 1.59-2.20 compared with living alone). Incidence was especially high for some high-risk groups, including men, people with comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder and those with high levels of education. However, women reported less victimisation in sheltered housing than living alone or with family, if they also reported drug or alcohol use.

conclusionsThe high prevalence and incidence of victimisation among residents in sheltered housing highlights the need for more awareness and surveillance of victimisation in this population group, to better facilitate a recovery-enabling environment for residents with SMI.

Indexed as

living conditionsserious mental illnesssheltered housingsupported housingVictimisation

Identifiers

PMID33952367
PMCPMC8142546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.