Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33952275›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2021

The effects of different repair methods for a posterior root tear of the lateral meniscus on the biomechanics of the knee: a finite element analysis.

Jian-Yu Wang, Yan-Song Qi, Hu-Ri-Cha Bao, Yong-Sheng Xu, Bao-Gang Wei, Yong-Xiang Wang, Bing-Xian Ma, Hui-Wen Zhou, Fei Lv

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jian-Yu Wang *Department of Orthopedics, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, No.20 Zhao Wu Da Street, Hohhot, 010017, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Yan-Song Qi *Department of Orthopedics, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, No.20 Zhao Wu Da Street, Hohhot, 010017, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Hu-Ri-Cha Bao *Department of Orthopedics, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, No.20 Zhao Wu Da Street, Hohhot, 010017, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Yong-Sheng XuDepartment of Orthopedics, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, No.20 Zhao Wu Da Street, Hohhot, 010017, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. xys_sportsmedicine@126.com.
Bao-Gang WeiDepartment of Orthopedics, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, No.20 Zhao Wu Da Street, Hohhot, 010017, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Yong-Xiang WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, No.20 Zhao Wu Da Street, Hohhot, 010017, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Bing-Xian MaDepartment of Orthopedics, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, No.20 Zhao Wu Da Street, Hohhot, 010017, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Hui-Wen ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, No.20 Zhao Wu Da Street, Hohhot, 010017, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Fei LvDepartment of Orthopedics, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, No.20 Zhao Wu Da Street, Hohhot, 010017, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81560374National Natural Science Foundation of China 81960399Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia 2017MS08136Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia 2018BS08002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore the impact of different repair methods for a lateral meniscus posterior root tear on the biomechanics of the knee joint using finite element analysis.

methodsFinite element models of a healthy knee were established on the basis of MRI data from a volunteer using Mimics software, and the validity of the models was tested. The changes in the contact mechanics and kinematics of these finite element models under different repair approaches were then analyzed and compared.

resultsThe normal meniscus had the maximum joint contact area, the minimum contact pressure, and the minimum contact stress. When total meniscectomy of the lateral meniscus was performed, the lateral compartment had the minimum joint contact area, the maximum contact pressure and the maximum contact stress. When complete avulsions of the posterior root of the lateral meniscus occurred, the maximum values of contact pressure and contact stress were between those of an intact meniscus and those of a meniscus treated with total meniscectomy. Lateral meniscal root attachment reconstruction by the single-stitch and double-stitch techniques resulted in a significant decrease in joint contact pressure and contact stress, leading to values comparable to those of a normal knee joint, and the double-stitch technique performed better than the single-stitch technique.

conclusionsRepair surgery for lateral meniscal posterior root avulsions can effectively restore the contact mechanics and kinematics of the knee joint, and the double-stitch technique can result in better clinical outcomes than the single-stitch technique.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisSuture TechniquesAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansKnee JointMeniscectomyMenisci, TibialPlastic Surgery ProceduresPressureTibial Meniscus InjuriesBiomechanicsFinite element analysisKnee jointPosterior root tear of lateral meniscus

Identifiers

PMID33952275
PMCPMC8097866
OpenAlexW3157416826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.