Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33952254›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2021

Psychometric properties of brief-COPE inventory among nurses.

Hanif Abdul Rahman, Wegdan Bani Issa, Lin Naing

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06860581 (The Impact of Dietary Supplementation With Lactobacillus Helveticus and Bifidobacterium Longum on the Functioning of the Brain-gut Axis, in the Context of Mental Health, Eating Patterns and Nutritional Status of Young Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06860581 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Dietary Supplementation With Lactobacillus Helveticus and Bifidobacterium Longum on the Functioning of the Brain-gut Axis, in the Context of Mental Health, Eating Patterns and Nutritional Status of Young Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorPoznan University of Life SciencesRan2023 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsHealthy Volunteers, Young Adult, WomenArmsIntervention (Sanprobi®Stress), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Medical registrars at the University of the Free State: Burnout, resilience and coping strategies.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Structural Validation of the Brief COPE Scale among Outpatients with Alcohol and Opioid Use Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mediation Effect of Maladaptive Coping between Work-to-Family Conflict and Cardiovascular Health Behaviors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanif Abdul RahmanPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Tungku Link Road, Gadong, BE1410, Brunei. hanif.rahman@ubd.edu.bn.
Wegdan Bani IssaResearch Institute for Medical and Health Sciences, Health Promotion Research Group, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Lin NaingPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Tungku Link Road, Gadong, BE1410, Brunei.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBrief-COPE inventory is widely used to assess coping; however, validation evidence is absent and previous results were inconsistent. This study aimed to validate psychometric properties of this inventory to ensure culturally appropriate usage.

methodsPreliminary validation study on 423 female nurses from the United Arab Emirates. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with maximum likelihood estimation was computed to test four different previous models. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) protocol was used to determine underlying domain structure of Brief-COPE in this population.

resultsThe four previous models on CFA had inadequate fit indexes. Two-factor (22-items) second-order model that explained 37.0% of the total variance with Cronbach's alpha at 0.81 and 0.88, respectively, was suggested.

conclusionThis validation of Brief-COPE is timely considering nurses enduring different types of stressors. In addition, cultural diversity needs to be considered in coping research. Re-assessment of this exploratory structure is necessary to ensure accurate measurement of coping strategies.

Indexed as

Brief-COPECopingNursesPsychometricsReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID33952254
PMCPMC8099710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.