Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33952234›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2021

Bidimensional structure and measurement equivalence of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9: sex-sensitive assessment of depressive symptoms in three representative German cohort studies.

Ana N Tibubos, Daniëlle Otten, Daniela Zöller, Harald Binder, Philipp S Wild, Toni Fleischer, Hamimatunnisa Johar, Seryan Atasoy, Lara Schulze, Karl-Heinz Ladwig and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prevalence of post-acute coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms twelve months after hospitalization in participants retained in follow-up: analyses stratified by gender from a large prospective cohort.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Ana N TibubosDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Daniëlle OttenDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. Danielle.Otten@unimedizin-mainz.de.
Daniela ZöllerFreiburg Center of Data Analysis and Modelling, Mathematical Institute - Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Harald BinderFreiburg Center of Data Analysis and Modelling, Mathematical Institute - Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Philipp S WildPreventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Toni FleischerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Hamimatunnisa JoharDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Gieβen and Marburg, Gieβen, Germany.
Seryan AtasoyDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Gieβen and Marburg, Gieβen, Germany.
Lara SchulzeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Karl-Heinz LadwigDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Georg SchomerusDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Birgit LinkohrHelmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Epidemiology, Neuherberg, Germany.
Hans J GrabeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Johannes KruseDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Gieβen and Marburg, Gieβen, Germany.
Carsten-Oliver SchmidtInstitute for Community Management, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Thomas MünzelDZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany.
Jochem KönigInstitute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Elmar Brähler *Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Manfred E Beutel *Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) has been proposed as a reliable and valid screening instrument for depressive symptoms with one latent factor. However, studies explicitly testing alternative model structures found support for a two-dimensional structure reflecting a somatic and a cognitive-affective dimension. We investigated the bidimensional structure of the PHQ-9, with a somatic (sleeping problems, fatigability, appetitive problems, and psychomotor retardation) and a cognitive-affective dimension (lack of interest, depressed mood, negative feelings about self, concentration problems, and suicidal ideation), and tested for sex- and regional-differences.

methodsWe have included data from the GEnder-Sensitive Analyses of mental health trajectories and implications for prevention: A multi-cohort consortium (GESA). Privacy-preserving analyses to provide information on the overall population and cohort-specific information and analyses of variance to compare depressive, somatic and cognitive-affective symptoms between sexes and cohorts were executed in DataSHIELD. In order to determine the dimensionality and measurement invariance of the PHQ-9 we tested three models (1 factor, 2 correlated factors, and bifactor) via confirmatory analyses and performed multi-group confirmatory factor analysis.

resultsDifferences between sex and cohorts exist for PHQ-9 and for both of its dimensions. Women reported depressive symptoms in general as well as somatic and cognitive-affective symptoms more frequently. For all tested models an acceptable to excellent fit was found, consistently indicating a better model fit for the two-factor and bifactor model. Scalar measurement invariance was established between women and men, the three cohorts, and their interaction.

conclusionsThe two facets of depression should be taken into account when using PHQ-9, while data also render support to a general factor. Somatic and cognitive-affective symptoms assessed by the PHQ-9 can be considered equivalent across women and men and between different German populations from different regions.

Indexed as

DepressionPatient Health QuestionnaireCohort StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesCognitive-affective dimensionDepressionRegional differencesSex-differencesSomatic dimension

Identifiers

PMID33952234
PMCPMC8101182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.