Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33951890›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2022

Improved outcomes of high-risk relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma patients after high-dose chemotherapy: a 15-year analysis.

Yago Nieto, Stephen Gruschkus, Benigno C Valdez, Roy B Jones, Paolo Anderlini, Chitra Hosing, Uday Popat, Muzaffar Qazilbash, Partow Kebriaei, Amin Alousi and 23 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Yago NietoFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. ynieto@mdanderson.org.
Stephen GruschkusBiostatistics.
Benigno C ValdezFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Roy B JonesFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Paolo AnderliniFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Chitra HosingFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Uday PopatFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Muzaffar QazilbashFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Partow KebriaeiFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Amin AlousiFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Neeraj SainiFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Samer SrourFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Katayoun RezvaniFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Jeremy RamdialFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Melissa BarnettFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Alison GulbisPharmacy.
Terri Lynn ShiglePharmacy.
Sairah AhmedLymphoma and Myeloma.
Swaminathan IyerLymphoma and Myeloma.
Hun LeeLymphoma and Myeloma.
Ranjit NairLymphoma and Myeloma.
Simrit ParmarLymphoma and Myeloma.
Raphael SteinerLymphoma and Myeloma.
Bouthaina DabajaRadiation Oncology.
Chelsea PinnixRadiation Oncology.
Jillian GuntherRadiation Oncology.
Branko CuglievanPediatrics.
Kris MahadeoPediatrics.
Sajad KhazalPediatrics.
Hubert ChuangNuclear Medicine at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Richard ChamplinFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Elizabeth J ShpallFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Borje S AnderssonFrom the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Cellular Therapeutics (United Kingdom) · GBLymphoma Research Foundation · USPediatrics and Genetics · USRadiation Oncology Associates · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCancer Research And Biostatistics · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplant (HDC/ASCT) is standard treatment for chemosensitive relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma, although outcomes of high-risk relapse (HRR) patients remain suboptimal. We retrospectively analyzed all HRR classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with HDC/ASCT at our institution between 01/01/2005 and 12/31/2019. HRR criteria included primary refractory disease/relapse within 1 year, extranodal extension, B symptoms, requiring more than one salvage line, or positron emission tomography (PET)-positive disease at ASCT. All patients met the same ASCT eligibility criteria. We treated 501 patients with BEAM (n=146), busulphan/melphalan (BuMel) (n=38), gemcitabine( Gem)/BuMel (n=189) and vorinostat/Gem/BuMel (n=128). The Gem/BuMel and vorinostat/Gem/BuMel cohorts had more HRR criteria and more patients with PET-positive disease at ASCT. Treatment with brentuximab vedotin (BV) or anti-PD1 prior to ASCT, PET-negative disease at ASCT, and maintenance BV increased over time. BEAM and BuMel predominated in earlier years (2005-2007), GemBuMel and BEAM in middle years (2008-2015), and vorinostat/GemBuMel and BEAM in later years (2016-2019). The median follow-up is 50 months (range, 6-186). Outcomes improved over time, with 2-year progressionfree survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS) rates of 58%/82% (2005-2007), 59%/83% (2008-2011), 71%/94% (2012-2015) and 86%/99% (2016- 2019) (P<0.0001). Five-year PFS/OS rates were 72%/87% after vorinostat/ GemBuMel, 55%/75% after GemBuMel, 45%/61% after BEAM, and 39%/57% after BuMel (PFS: P=0.0003; OS: P<0.0001). These differences persisted within the PET-negative and PET-positive subgroups. Prior BV and vorinostat/GemBuMel were independent predictors of more favorable outcome, whereas primary refractory disease, ≥2 salvage lines, bulky relapse, B symptoms and PET-positivity at ASCT correlated independently with unfavorable outcomes. In conclusion, post-HDC/ASCT outcomes of patients with HRR classic Hodgkin lymphoma have improved over the last 15 years. Pre-ASCT BV treatment and optimized synergistic HDC (vorinostat/GemBuMel) were associated with this improvement.

Indexed as

Hodgkin DiseaseAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrentuximab VedotinHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesBrentuximab Vedotin

Identifiers

PMID33951890
PMCPMC8968895
OpenAlexW3158310260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.