Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33951350›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2021

Ustekinumab is more effective than azathioprine to prevent endoscopic postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease.

Anthony Buisson, Stéphane Nancey, Luc Manlay, David T Rubin, Xavier Hebuterne, Benjamin Pariente, Mathurin Fumery, David Laharie, Xavier Roblin, Gilles Bommelaer and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Association between Preoperative Ustekinumab and Surgical Complications in Crohn's Disease Patients.European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Perioperative optimization of Crohn's disease.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. UEG week and UEG journal: A strong scientific liaison.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022
    Article
  19. Case Report: Managing Postoperative Crohn's Disease.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Anthony BuissonUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Inserm, 3iHP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6347-409X
Stéphane NanceyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Pierre Bénite, and INSERM U1111 - CIRI, Lyon, France.
Luc ManlayUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Inserm, 3iHP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
David T RubinInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Xavier HebuterneGastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, CHU of Nice, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Benjamin ParienteGastroenterology Department, University Hospital, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Mathurin FumeryGastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Amiens, France, and PériTox Laboratory (UMR-I 01), University Health Research Center, Jules Verne University of Picardy, Amiens, France.
David LaharieGastroenterology Department, University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Xavier RoblinGastroenterology Department, University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France.
Gilles BommelaerUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Inserm, 3iHP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bruno PereiraUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, DRCI, Unité de Biostatistiques, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Laurent Peyrin-BirouletDepartment of Gastroenterology, CHU Nancy Brabois, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
Lucine VuittonDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Besançon, University Bourgogne FrancheComté, Besançon, France.
USTEK Post-Op study group
Inserm · FRBordeaux Population Health · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRPérinatalité & Risques Toxiques · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FRUniversité de Lille · FRUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

ULTRASTRUCTURE AND CYTOMORPHOLOGY COREP30DK042086 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LIU, CAMBRIAN YANGSHAO · 1990 to 2025
$29.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK042086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreventing postoperative recurrence (POR) is a major concern in Crohn's disease (CD). While azathioprine is an option, no data is available on ustekinumab efficacy in this situation.

aimsWe compared the effectiveness of ustekinumab versus azathioprine in preventing endoscopic POR in CD.

methodsWe retrospectively collected data from all consecutive CD patients treated with ustekinumab after intestinal resection in 9 centers. The control group (azathioprine alone) was composed of patients who participated in a randomized controlled trial conducted in the same centers comparing azathioprine alone or in combination with curcumin. Propensity score analyses (inversed probability of treatment weighting = IPTW) were applied to compare the two groups. The primary endpoint was endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts' index ≥ i2) at 6 months.

resultsOverall, 32 patients were included in the ustekinumab group and 31 in the azathioprine group. The propensity score analysis was adjusted on the main risk factors (smoking, fistulizing phenotype, prior bowel resection, resection length >30 cm and ≥2 biologics before surgery) and thiopurines or ustekinumab exposure prior to surgery making the two arms comparable (∣d∣ < 0.2). After IPTW, the rate of endoscopic POR at 6 months was lower in patients treated with ustekinumab compared to azathioprine (28.0% vs. 54.5%, p = 0.029). After IPTW, the rates of i2b-endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts' index ≥ i2b) and severe endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts' index ≥ i3) were 20.8% versus 42.5% (p = 0.066) and 16.9% versus 27.9% (p = 0.24), in the ustekinumab and azathioprine groups, respectively.

conclusionUstekinumab seemed to be more effective than azathioprine in preventing POR in this cohort of CD patients.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAzathioprineControl GroupsCrohn DiseaseFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMalePropensity ScoreRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSecondary PreventionUstekinumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAzathioprineGastrointestinal AgentsImmunosuppressive AgentsUstekinumabvedolizumabazathioprineCrohn's diseasepostoperative recurrenceustekinumab

Identifiers

PMID33951350
PMCPMC8259431
OpenAlexW3159107525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.