ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2021
3D Printed Porous Methacrylate/Silica Hybrid Scaffold for Bone Substitution.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative mechanical characterisation of 13-93 bioactive glass and hybrid scaffolds for bone regeneration.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Engineering a Bioactive PMMA-Silica Hybrid Scaffold for Enhanced Bone Regeneration.ACS applied bio materials · 2026Article
- Impact of Polymer Degradation on Cellular Behavior in Tissue Engineering.Bioprinting (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Advances in 3D-printed scaffold technologies for bone defect repair: materials, biomechanics, and clinical prospects.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Potential of Nano-Sustained-Release Factors for Bone Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Article
- Porous Copolymers of 3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl Methacrylate with Trimethylpropane Trimethacrylate Preparation: Structural Characterization and Thermal Degradation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Nanoengineered Silica-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Morphological Integrated Preparation Method and Implementation of Inorganic/Organic Dual-Phase Composite Gradient Bionic Bone Scaffold.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024Article
- Review
- Poly(methyl methacrylate) in Orthopedics: Strategies, Challenges, and Prospects in Bone Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2024Review
- Fabrication and Optimization of 3D-Printed Silica Scaffolds for Neural Precursor Cell Cultivation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- 3D printing of biomaterials for vascularized and innervated tissue regeneration.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Robocasting and Laser Micromachining of Sol-Gel Derived 3D Silica/Gelatin/β-TCP Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Hybprinting for musculoskeletal tissue engineering.iScience · 2022Review
- Clinically relevant preclinical animal models for testing novel cranio-maxillofacial bone 3D-printed biomaterials.Clinical and translational medicine · 2022Review
- 3D Printed Porous Methacrylate/Silica Hybrid Scaffold for Bone Substitution.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021Article
- Novel 3D printed TPMS scaffolds: microstructure, characteristics and applications in bone regeneration.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inorganic-organic hybrid biomaterials made with star polymer poly(methyl methacrylate-co-3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate) and silica
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.