Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33951275›Full record

ArticleObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2021

Implementation of childhood obesity prevention and control policies in the United States and Latin America: Lessons for cross-border research and practice.

Rafael Pérez-Escamilla, Mireya Vilar-Compte, Elizabeth Rhodes, Olga L Sarmiento, Camila Corvalan, Rachel Sturke, Susan Vorkoper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. From preschool to policy: A scoping review of recommended interventions for a systems approach to improve dietary intake in early childhood.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advancing precision public health for obesity in children.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rafael Pérez-EscamillaDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9416-8039
Mireya Vilar-CompteEQUIDE Research Institute for Equitable Development, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9047-1102
Elizabeth RhodesDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0920-8644
Olga L SarmientoSchool of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Camila CorvalanInstitute of Nutrition, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-3766-7709
Rachel SturkeFogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Susan VorkoperFogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6368-9111

Funding

Yale Scholars in Implementation Science (YSIS)K12HL138037 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHARIFI, MAHNOOSH · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
ACL HHS U48DP006380NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006380NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL138037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress has been made in the development and widespread implementation of effective interventions to address childhood obesity, yet important challenges remain. To understand how the United States and Latin American countries achieved success in implementing obesity policies and programs (PAPs) and identify improvement opportunities using implementation science principles. We identified three comparative case studies: (1) front-of-food package labeling (Mexico and Chile); (2) Open Streets/play streets (Colombia and the United States); and (3) the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (Brazil and the United States). Information from multiple sources (e.g., scientific and gray literature and key informant interviews) was synthesized to describe barriers, facilitators, and progress of PAPs across RE-AIM framework dimensions. Evidence-based advocacy along with political will and evidence of scalability and impact were key for successful launch and implementation of all PAPs. Diverse adaptations of PAP design and implementation had to be done across contexts. Stronger process and impact monitoring and evaluation systems that track equity indicators are needed to maximize the population benefits of these PAPs. Implementation science offers an important contribution toward addressing knowledge gaps, enhancing obesity policy dialogue, and producing transferable lessons across the Americas and, therefore, should be used for research and evaluation during PAP development and throughout the implementation and maintenance phases.

Indexed as

Pediatric ObesityChildFood LabelingHumansLatin AmericaMexicoPolicyUnited Stateschildhood obesityimplementation scienceLatin AmericaLatino populations

Identifiers

PMID33951275
PMCPMC8365637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.