Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33951248›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2021

The role of health beliefs in affecting patients' chronic diabetic complication screening: a path analysis based on the health belief model.

Lingjun Jiang, Suzhen Liu, Hang Li, Linna Xie, Yuan Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cessation of Face Mask Use after COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Diabetes: Prevalence and Determinants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lingjun JiangWest China School of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4009-9220
Suzhen LiuWest China School of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hang LiWest China School of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Linna XieWest China School of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuan JiangWest China School of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesTo explore the role of health beliefs in affecting patients' chronic diabetic complication (CDC) screening.

backgroundPatients' adherence to the guideline-recommended CDC screening was far from optimal. While many demographic and clinical characteristics were documented to influence patients' adherence, psychological profiles, such as health beliefs, were not well studied before. It is crucial to understand how health beliefs affect patients' CDC screening behaviour and thus to provide implications for future intervention programmes.

designA cross-sectional study was conducted.

methods785 type 2 diabetes were enrolled from the community health centre in Wuhou District, Chengdu, China. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data regarding the demographic and clinical information, knowledge about CDC, health belief model constructs and CDC screening behaviour. Mediation analysis was performed to explore the mechanisms of health belief model constructs on CDC screening behaviour. The study methods were compliant with the STROBE checklist.

resultsKnowledge had a significant indirect effect on CDC screening behaviour through perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barriers and self-efficiency. Cues to action exerted both significant direct and indirect effects on CDC screening behaviour. The indirect effects of cues to action were exerted through perceived susceptibility, perceived barriers and self-efficiency.

conclusionHealth beliefs played vital roles in mediating the effects of knowledge and cues to action on patients' CDC screening behaviour. Health beliefs should be assessed and modified through creative educational methods. Strategies aimed at increasing cues to action are also expected to facilitate patients' CDC screening behaviour. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICES: The study contributes to the exploration of how health beliefs affect patients' CDC screening behaviour. The results could be used to inspire future community-based intervention programmes.

Indexed as

Diabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Cross-Sectional StudiesHealth Belief ModelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMass ScreeningSurveys and Questionnaireschronic diabetic complicationcomplication screeninghealth belief modelpath analysistype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID33951248
PMCPMC8453575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.