ArticlePloS one2021
Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- Women and clinicians' views, preferences and experiences of caesarean section and vaginal birth in India: a qualitative substudy of the 'Misoprostol or Oxytocin for Labour Induction' (MOLI) trial.BMJ global health · 2025Trial
- Midwives' perspective on participation of pregnant individuals planning an elective caesarean section delivery in antenatal classes in Germany: a qualitative interview study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Article
- Identifying factors contributing to health workers' preferences for elective caesarean section: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Prevalence, indications, and preference of caesarean section deliveries among women attending primary health care units in Port-Said City, Egypt.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2026Article
- What Should Be Discussed When Considering a Vaginal Birth? A Delphi Consensus Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- Mapping the gendered dynamics of cesarean section: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Informing Decision-Making About Caesarean Birth: A Delphi Study to Develop a Core Information Set.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Two Low-Dose Regimens of Intravenous Fentanyl for Pain Relief During Labor: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Determinants of Negative Childbirth Experience and Its Influence on Mode of Delivery Decisions.Cureus · 2025Article
- Prevalence and predictors of caesarean deliveries at the Tamale teaching hospital in Northern Ghana.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Two Decades of Change in Childbirth Care in Cambodia (2000-2021): Disparities in Ceasarean Section Utilization Between Public and Private Facilities.Global health research and policy · 2025Article
- Investigating the effect of the digital storytelling of peers' childbirth experiences on the perception and mode of childbirth: a quasi-experimental study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- The struggle over caesarean section on maternal request: an ethical principles approach to Swedish media portrayal.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Women's perspectives of decision-making for labour and birth: a qualitative antenatal-postnatal paired interview study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Using linked data to explore medical complications associated with Robson classification of cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts, 2011 to 2018.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
- Region-specific variation and determinants of caesarean delivery among ever-married women in Bangladesh.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Determinants of Delivery Mode Preferences and Decision-Making Among Jordanian Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of pregnancy · 2025Article
- Cesarean delivery on maternal request in Brazil: an analysis based on the perceptions of survivors of the placenta accreta spectrum.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCaesarean sections (CS) continue to increase worldwide. Multiple and complex factors are contributing to the increase, including non-clinical factors related to individual women, families and their interactions with health providers. This global qualitative evidence synthesis explores women's preferences for mode of birth and factors underlying preferences for CS.
methodsSystematic database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) were conducted in December 2016 and updated in May 2019 and February 2021. Studies conducted across all resource settings were eligible for inclusion, except those from China and Taiwan which have been reported in a companion publication. Phenomena of interest were opinions, views and perspectives of women regarding preferences for mode of birth, attributes of CS, societal and cultural beliefs about modes of birth, and right to choose mode of birth. Thematic synthesis of data was conducted. Confidence in findings was assessed using GRADE-CERQual.
resultsWe included 52 studies, from 28 countries, encompassing the views and perspectives of pregnant women, non-pregnant women, women with previous CS, postpartum women, and women's partners. Most of the studies were conducted in high-income countries and published between 2011 and 2021. Factors underlying women preferences for CS had to do mainly with strong fear of pain and injuries to the mother and child during labour or birth (High confidence), uncertainty regarding vaginal birth (High confidence), and positive views or perceived advantages of CS (High confidence). Women who preferred CS expressed resoluteness about it, but there were also many women who had a clear preference for vaginal birth and those who even developed strategies to keep their birth plans in environments that were not supportive of vaginal births (High confidence). The findings also identified that social, cultural and personal factors as well as attributes related to health systems impact on the reasons underlying women preferences for various modes of birth (High confidence).
conclusionsA wide variety of factors underlie women's preferences for CS in the absence of medical indications. Major factors contributing to perceptions of CS as preferable include fear of pain, uncertainty with vaginal birth and positive views on CS. Interventions need to address these factors to reduce unnecessary CS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.