ArticlePLoS biology2021
The human visual system differentially represents subjectively and objectively invisible stimuli.
Article in PLoS biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The act of detecting a stimulus contaminates measures of conscious experience with decision biases.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Criterion placement threatens the construct validity of neural measures of consciousness.eLife · 2025Article
- Decoding dynamic faces and scenes without awareness under dis-continuous flash suppression.Communications biology · 2025Article
- New methods, old questions: advancing the study of unconscious perception.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
- Neural correlates of unconscious processing in functional magnetic resonance imaging: does brain activity contain more information than can be consciously reported?Neuroscience of consciousness · 2025Article
- Brain Representation in Conscious and Unconscious Vision.Journal of cognition · 2025Article
- Progressing, not regressing: A possible solution to the problem of regression to the mean in unconscious processing studies.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Review
- Spatial perspective and identity in visual awareness of the bodily self-other distinction.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Time Courses of Attended and Ignored Object Representations.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2023Article
- Illusory object recognition is either perceptual or cognitive in origin depending on decision confidence.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Efficient Video Watermarking Algorithm Based on Convolutional Neural Networks with Entropy-Based Information Mapper.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Informative neural representations of unseen contents during higher-order processing in human brains and deep artificial networks.Nature human behaviour · 2022Article
- An academic survey on theoretical foundations, common assumptions and the current state of consciousness science.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2022Article
- Article
- Apical amplification-a cellular mechanism of conscious perception?Neuroscience of consciousness · 2021Article
- Consciousness Under the Spotlight: The Problem of Measuring Subjective Experience.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of unconscious processing requires a measure of conscious awareness. Awareness measures can be either subjective (based on participant's report) or objective (based on perceptual performance). The preferred awareness measure depends on the theoretical position about consciousness and may influence conclusions about the extent of unconscious processing and about the neural correlates of consciousness. We obtained functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements from 43 subjects while they viewed masked faces and houses that were either subjectively or objectively invisible. Even for objectively invisible (perceptually indiscriminable) stimuli, we found significant category information in both early, lower-level visual areas and in higher-level visual cortex, although representations in anterior, category-selective ventrotemporal areas were less robust. For subjectively invisible stimuli, similar to visible stimuli, there was a clear posterior-to-anterior gradient in visual cortex, with stronger category information in ventrotemporal cortex than in early visual cortex. For objectively invisible stimuli, however, category information remained virtually unchanged from early visual cortex to object- and category-selective visual areas. These results demonstrate that although both objectively and subjectively invisible stimuli are represented in visual cortex, the extent of unconscious information processing is influenced by the measurement approach. Furthermore, our data show that subjective and objective approaches are associated with different neural correlates of consciousness and thus have implications for neural theories of consciousness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.