Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33950958›Full record

ArticleMedicine2021

The efficacy and safety of moxibustion for chronic fatigue syndrome: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kaiyang Xue, Yanping Wang, Xianzhu Wang, Pingnan Chen, Caihong Xiao, Jing Fu, Jin Cui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From traditional warming and tonifying to psychoneuroimmunology: theoretical reconstruction and clinical application of moxibustion for cancer-related fatigue.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Case for Moxibustion for Painful Syndromes: History, principles and rationale.Current research in complementary & alternative medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kaiyang XueGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guizhou.ORCID 0000-0002-4129-2316
Yanping WangJiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangxi, China.
Xianzhu WangGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guizhou.
Pingnan ChenGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guizhou.
Caihong XiaoGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guizhou.
Jing FuGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guizhou.
Jin CuiGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guizhou.
Weatherford College · USJiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program Social Development Subsidy Project No: 3040-040200104National Key R&D Program Social Development Subsidy Project No: 3040-040200104)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pathogenesis of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is not clear. The main purpose of treatment is to improve autoimmune function and relieve fatigue symptoms. Moxibustion is often used to treat diseases caused by low autoimmunity, especially in relieving fatigue symptoms. It is a superior therapy for CFS in traditional Chinese medicine. At present, there is a lack of the high level clinical evidence to support the moxibustion in the treatment of CFS, so this study will systematically review and analyze the currently available randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of moxibustion in the treatment of CFS.

methodsWe will systematically search PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Sinomed, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Database, ClinicalTrials.gov and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry will also be searched. The time range for the search will be from database activation to March 31, 2021. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) associated with moxibustion for CFS will be included, regardless of language.We will use the standard proposed in Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0 to assess the bias risk of a single RCT. The main outcome index of the study is Fatigue Assessment Instrument (FAI), secondary outcome indexes will include Fatigue Scale -14 (FS-14), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), natural killer (NK) cells, interleukin- 2 (IL-2), T lymphocyte subsets (CD4+, CD8+), cure rate, total efficiency and adverse reactions. The random effect model meta was used to analyze the effect data of a single RCT. Heterogeneity will be measured by Cochran Q test and I-squared statistics. We will use 2 subgroup analyses to explore the source of heterogeneity. RCTs with high bias risk was excluded and adjustment effect model was used for sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of the meta-analysis results. The publication bias included in RCTs will be assessed by funnel plot and Egger test.

resultsThis study will objectively and comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of randomized controlled trials of moxibustion in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome, and the results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication.

conclusionThis systematic review will provide clinicians with the latest high-quality evidence for the use of moxibustion in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202140063.

Indexed as

Fatigue Syndrome, ChronicHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicMoxibustionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33950958
PMCPMC8104202
OpenAlexW3157298426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.