Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33950856›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2021

Navigating possible endometriosis in primary care: a qualitative study of GP perspectives.

Sharon Dixon, Abigail McNiven, Amelia Talbot, Lisa Hinton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. 'It's not just thrush, it's recurrent thrush': a qualitative study of patient and clinician perspectives on diagnosing recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  5. Accumulative experiences of recurrent vulvovaginal thrush: a qualitative study of primary care navigation from patient and clinician perspectives.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. 'I think it is helpful … I mean it's not always helpful' - diagnostic complexity in endometriosis: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. 'The Difficulty of Diagnosis Compromises Patient Care for People With Endometriosis': Interview Study With Aotearoa New Zealand General Practitioners.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. 'My patients are "gunning for a fight" that I don't want': reflecting on feeling dismissed and conflict- expectant consultations.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  15. Survey of General Practitioner Perspectives on Endometriosis Diagnosis, Referrals, Management and Guidelines in New Zealand.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Supporting teenagers with period pain in general practice: clinical review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  18. Endometriosis: time to think differently (and together).The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sharon DixonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Abigail McNivenNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Amelia TalbotNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Lisa HintonTHIS Institute, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis affects approximately 6-10% of women, with well documented delays between initial presentation with symptoms and diagnosis. In England, women typically seek help first in primary care, making this setting pivotal in women's pathways to diagnosis and treatment. English GP perspectives on managing possible endometriosis have not been previously reported.

aimTo explore what GPs identify as important considerations when caring for women with symptoms that raise the possibility of endometriosis. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative study in English primary care.

methodSemi-structured scenario-based telephone interviews with 42 GPs from April 2019 to January 2020, based around a fictional scenario of a woman presenting to primary care with symptoms suggesting possible endometriosis. Interviews were thematically coded and analysed.

resultsManaging possible endometriosis in primary care brings challenges. While knowledge and awareness were prerequisites for considering endometriosis, other important considerations were raised. Symptoms suggestive of endometriosis are non-specific, making endometriosis one possible consideration of many. GPs move through a diagnostic hierarchy to exclude sinister causes and utilise trials of treatment as both therapeutic interventions and diagnostic tools; processes which take time. An endometriosis label or diagnosis has advantages and risks. GPs reported sharing decisions about investigation and referral while holding women's priorities as pivotal. These conversations were underpinned by their knowledge of uncertainties and unknowns, including the wide spectrum and unpredictability of endometriosis.

conclusionGPs considerations are more complex than simply lacking awareness. The unknowns surrounding endometriosis matter to GPs. Further research and tailored resources for primary care, where women present with undifferentiated symptoms, are needed.

Indexed as

EndometriosisGeneral PractitionersAttitude of Health PersonnelEnglandFemaleHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchReferral and Consultationdysmenorrheaendometriosisprimary carequalitative researchreferral and consultation

Identifiers

PMID33950856
PMCPMC8340732
OpenAlexW3158708223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.