Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33950851›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2021

Experiences of general practice care for self-harm: a qualitative study of young people's perspectives.

Faraz Mughal, Lisa Dikomitis, Opeyemi O Babatunde, Carolyn A Chew-Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Young people's mental health: an NHS primary care perspective, 10 years on.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  5. Exploring Support Preferences for Young Women Who Self-Harm: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring General Practitioners' Management of Self-Harm in Young People: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The functions of self-harm in young people and their perspectives about future general practitioner-led care: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Improving the management of self-harm in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Young people who have fallen through the mental health transition gap: a qualitative study on primary care support.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The need for compassionate self-harm services.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Faraz MughalSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele; affiliate, NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Keele University, Keele; honorary clinical research fellow, Unit of Academic Primary Care, University of Warwick, Coventry.
Lisa DikomitisSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.
Opeyemi O BabatundeSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.
Carolyn A Chew-GrahamSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele; honorary professor of primary care mental health, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-harm is a growing concern and rates of self-harm in young people (aged 12-25 years) presenting to general practice are rising. There is, however, little evidence about young people's experiences of GP care and on accessing general practice.

aimTo explore the help-seeking behaviours, experiences of GP care, and access to general practice of young people who self-harm. DESIGN AND

settingIn this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with young people aged 16-25 years from England with previous self-harm behaviour.

methodInterviews with 13 young people took place between April and November 2019. Young people were recruited from the community, third-sector organisations, and Twitter. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis with principles of constant comparison. A patient and public involvement advisory group informed recruitment strategies and supported interpretation of findings.

resultsYoung people described the avenues of help-seeking they employ and reflected on the mixed experiences of seeing GPs that can influence future help-seeking. Preconceptions and a lack of knowledge about accessing general practice were found to be barriers to help-seeking. GPs who attempt to understand the young person and establish relationship-based care can facilitate young people accessing general practice for self-harm.

conclusionIt is important young people are aware of how to access general practice and that GPs listen, understand, and proactively follow-up young people who self-harm. Supporting young people with self-harm behaviour requires continuity of care.

Indexed as

General PracticeSelf-Injurious BehaviorAdolescentEnglandFamily PracticeHumansQualitative Researchfamily medicinehelp-seeking behaviourprimary healthcarequalitative researchself-injurious behaviouryouth

Identifiers

PMID33950851
PMCPMC8340729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.