Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33950572›Full record

Observational studyAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2021

Extensive microbiological respiratory tract specimen characterization in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Kim Thomsen, Henrik Planck Pedersen, Susanne Iversen, Lothar Wiese, Kurt Fuursted, Henrik Vedel Nielsen, Jens Jørgen Elmer Christensen, Xiaohui Chen Nielsen

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. High co-infection burden and ICU-specific pathogen profiles in pediatric Candida albicans respiratory infections: a large-scale tNGS analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Extensive microbiological respiratory tract specimen characterization in critically ill COVID-19 patients.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2021
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kim ThomsenThe Regional Department of Clinical Microbiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Henrik Planck PedersenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Roskilde, Denmark.
Susanne IversenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
Lothar WieseDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Roskilde, Denmark.
Kurt FuurstedDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik Vedel NielsenDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens Jørgen Elmer ChristensenThe Regional Department of Clinical Microbiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Xiaohui Chen NielsenThe Regional Department of Clinical Microbiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial co-infections may contribute to the pulmonary deterioration in COVID-19 patients needing intensive care treatment. The present study portrays the extent of co-infections in COVID-19 ICU patients. Conventional culture, molecular detections for atypical aetiologies, QiaStat-Dx® respiratory panel V2 detecting 21 respiratory pathogens and ribosomal DNA genes 16S/18S amplicon-based microbiome analyses were performed on respiratory samples from 34 COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. Potential pathogens were detected in seven patients (21%) by culturing, in four patients (12%) by microbiome analysis and in one patient (3%) by respiratory panel. Among 20 patients receiving antibiotics prior to ICU admission, fungi (3 Candida albicans, 1 C. tropicalis, 1 C. dubliniensis) were cultured in 5 (15%) endotracheal aspirates. Among 14 patients who were antibiotic-naive at ICU admission, two patients (6%) had bacterial respiratory pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae) cultured in their endotracheal aspirates. Microbiome analysis recognized four potential respiratory pathogens (3 Haemophilus influenza, 1 Fusobacterium necrophorum) isolated in samples from four other patients (12%). QiaStat-Dx® respiratory panel V2 detected adenovirus in one patient (3%). The prevalence of pulmonary microbial co-infections is modest among COVID-19 patients upon admission to ICU. Microbiome analysis complements conventional microbial diagnostics in characterization of respiratory co-infections.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2AgedCohort StudiesCoinfectionCOVID-19Critical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMicrobiotaMiddle AgedRespiratory Systemco-infectionsCOVID-19microbiological characterizationmicrobiomeSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33950572
PMCPMC8239678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.