ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2022
Return to work of breast cancer survivors: toward an integrative and transactional conceptual model.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Return to work for health professionals with breast cancer as health recipients: A systematized review.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2026Pooled it
- Ecosystem Barriers and Facilitators Linked to the Fear of Cancer Recurrence: An Umbrella Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Physical Activity Interventions on Return to Work After a Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2023Pooled it
- Selecting the optimal version of the post-traumatic growth inventory - short form for cancer survivors: a study using a sequential design.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Latent profile analysis of return-to-work readiness and self-efficacy among breast cancer survivors who have not returned to work post-surgery.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Association between return-to-work trajectories and depressive symptoms in long-term breast cancer survivors: results from the French CONSTANCES cohort.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- From treatment to return to work in chilean breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Return to work or leaving work? Differences of return to work between breast cancer patients and the general population and determinants of return to work.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Observational
- Feasibility, reliability and validity of smartphone administered cognitive ecological momentary assessments in breast cancer survivors.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Characterizing cancer-related cognitive impairments and impact on quality of life in women with metastatic breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Validation of the Return-to-Work Obstacles and Self-Efficacy Scale for Women on Sick Leave Due to Breast Cancer (ROSES-BC).Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Supporting the return to work of breast cancer survivors: perspectives from Canadian employer representatives.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Article
- Return to work and psychosocial trajectories after breast cancer: a longitudinal and sequential approach.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Breast Cancer Survivors' Experiences of Managers' Actions During the Return to Work Process: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Comparison of Machine Learning Methods in the Study of Cancer Survivors' Return to Work: An Example of Breast Cancer Survivors with Work-Related Factors in the CONSTANCES Cohort.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Symptom Clusters in Survivorship and Their Impact on Ability to Work among Cancer Survivors.Cancers · 2023Article
- Return-to-work self-efficacy questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation in China.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Supporting Return to Work after Breast Cancer: A Mixed Method Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Subjective cancer-related cognitive impairments and salience network connectivity in breast cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Article
- Cancer survivors and adverse work outcomes: associated factors and supportive interventions.British medical bulletin · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo propose a conceptual framework of the return to work (RTW) of breast cancer survivors (BCS) according to the transactional perspective.
methodsThe Technique for Research of Information by Animation of a Group of Experts was implemented. For each determinant in an initial list established from the literature, experts selected for the consensus exercise were firstly asked to indicate their agreement level individually, via an online questionnaire. Determinants obtaining an agreement level of 80% or over during this first phase were retained. Determinants obtaining an agreement level below 80%, and additional determinants proposed by the experts, were then discussed collectively. After discussion, experts voted via a new online questionnaire to retain (or not) each determinant. Determinants obtaining an agreement level of 80% or over after this second phase were retained. Based on the determinants selected, a conceptual model was developed following the transactional approach.
resultsEleven experts participated in the study. Forty of the 51 determinants listed initially from the literature achieved an agreement level over 80%, and 20 were added after the individual consultation phase. Twenty-two of the 31 determinants discussed collectively were retained. In total, 62 determinants were selected to construct the conceptual model.
conclusionsThis integrative, operational, and transactional conceptual model of the RTW of BCS, constructed following an expert consensus, will help to design more efficient patient-centered intervention studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Identification of the 62 determinants associated with the RTW of BCS will help design tools that are easily used by all stakeholders involved in the RTW process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.