Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33950424›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Effluent treatment using activated carbon adsorbents: a bibliometric analysis of recent literature.

Danilo Henrique da Silva Santos, Juliana Cristina Pereira Lima Paulino, Gleybhson Felipe Dos Santos Alves, Leonardo Mendonça Tenório de Magalhães Oliveira, Patrícia de Carvalho Nagliate, José Leandro da Silva Duarte, Lucas Meili, Josealdo Tonholo, Carmem Lucia de Paiva E Silva Zanta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danilo Henrique da Silva SantosLaboratório de Eletroquímica Aplicada, Instituto de Química e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, UFAL, Maceió, Brazil.
Juliana Cristina Pereira Lima PaulinoLaboratório de Processos, Centro de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, UFAL, Maceió, Brazil.
Gleybhson Felipe Dos Santos AlvesLaboratório de Eletroquímica Aplicada, Instituto de Química e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, UFAL, Maceió, Brazil.
Leonardo Mendonça Tenório de Magalhães OliveiraLaboratório de Processos, Centro de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, UFAL, Maceió, Brazil.
Patrícia de Carvalho NagliateEscola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, UFAL, Maceió, Brazil.
José Leandro da Silva DuarteLaboratório de Eletroquímica Aplicada, Instituto de Química e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, UFAL, Maceió, Brazil.
Lucas MeiliLaboratório de Processos, Centro de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, UFAL, Maceió, Brazil. lucas.meili@ctec.ufal.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0307-8204
Josealdo TonholoLaboratório de Eletroquímica Aplicada, Instituto de Química e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, UFAL, Maceió, Brazil.
Carmem Lucia de Paiva E Silva ZantaLaboratório de Eletroquímica Aplicada, Instituto de Química e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, UFAL, Maceió, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Alagoas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural practices and industrial and human discharges play an important role in the generation of highly contaminated effluents, which becomes a threat to the environment. The persistence of many of these compounds to conventional treatments in recent years has meant that numerous efforts have been devoted to the proposal of new selective materials that allow the removal of these contaminants by adsorption. In addition, bibliometric studies have grown as powerful tools to indicate trends in innovation. In this way, the present study consisted of evaluating the potential interest to use activated carbon as adsorbent through a prospection study in scientific and technological databases. The number of records obtained for the use of activated carbon in effluent remediation processes is equivalent to 4898, which corresponds to approximately 2.5% of the total documents (articles/patents) found for the use of carbon with no defined purpose. A total of 2275 works that used the adsorptive property of activated carbon were recovered. According to the data recovered, Brazil is the leader in scientific publications among Latin American countries and the 12th worldwide, according to the SciELO and Scopus databases, respectively. In general, a significant number of patents have been recovered for this theme, in the Derwent database, 1167 documents were recovered. The results obtained in this work evidenced the growing interest in developing technologies in this area.

Indexed as

Carbonaceous materialsPollutant removalRemediationTrendsWastewater

Identifiers

PMID33950424
OpenAlexW3158719847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.