Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33950407›Full record

GuidelineLangenbeck's archives of surgery2021

German National Guideline on the management of pilonidal disease: update 2020.

I Iesalnieks, A Ommer, A Herold, D Doll

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReviewPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05851690 (Bilaterally Parallel Elliptic Flap Versus Karydakis Flap in Pilonidal Sinus Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05851690 nacompletednot on this map

Bilaterally Parallel Elliptic Flap Versus Karydakis Flap in Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtlas UniversityRan2016 to 2020Enrolled102ConditionsPilonidal SinusArmsSurgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy after Bascom's cleft lift surgery for pilonidal sinus disease: A randomized study comparing healing.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

I IesalnieksDept. of Surgery, München Klinik Bogenhausen, Englschalkinger Str. 77, 81925, Munich, Germany. iesalnieks_igors@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1548-6798
A OmmerEnd- und Dickdarm-Zentrum Essen, Essen, Germany.
A HeroldEnd- und Dickdarmzentrum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
D DollDept. of Procto-Surgery, St. Marienhospital Vechta, Vechta, Germany.
München Klinik Bogenhausen · DEUniversity of Vechta · DEWest German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present German National Guideline is an updated version of previous Guideline published in 2014. It aims to compare various treatment methods and to assist physicians with evidence-based recommendations.

methodsSystemic literature review.

resultsThree types of disease manifestation could be differentiated: asymptomatic disease, an acute abscess, and the chronic pilonidal disease. At present, there is no treatment method fulfilling all desired criteria: simple, painless procedure associated with rapid wound healing, and low recurrence rate. Thus, treatment modality should be tailored to disease manifestation and extent.

conclusionAsymptomatic pilonidal disease should not be treated. A pilonidal abscess should be unroofed. After resolution of the acute inflammation, the disease should be treated definitely. As for today, sinus excision is the standard treatment of the chronic pilonidal disease. Wide excision and open treatment of chronic disease is a safe procedure which, however, leads to prolonged secondary healing and time off-work, as well as to considerable recurrence rate. The extent of excision should be as limited as possible. Excision and midline wound closure is associated with impaired outcomes. Today, it has become obsolete. Minimally invasive procedures (e.g., pit picking surgery) represent a treatment option for chronic pilonidal disease. However, the recurrence rate is higher compared to excision procedures. Nevertheless, they may be used for small primary disease. Off-midline procedures should be used for disease not suitable for minimally invasive treatments. The Limberg flap and the Karydakis procedure are two best described methods which are associated with similar short- and long-term results.

Indexed as

Pilonidal SinusAbscessHumansRecurrenceSurgical FlapsWound HealingPilonidal abscessPilonidal diseasePilonidals sinusSurgery

Identifiers

PMID33950407
PMCPMC8097120
OpenAlexW3157572961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.