Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33950398›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

Against spatial-temporal discrepancy: contrastive learning-based network for surgical workflow recognition.

Tong Xia, Fucang Jia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of single-stage vision models for pose estimation of surgical instruments.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tong XiaShenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Fucang JiaShenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China. fc.jia@siat.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0075-979X

Funding

Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2019YFC0118100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAutomatic workflow recognition from surgical videos is fundamental and significant for developing context-aware systems in modern operating rooms. Although many approaches have been proposed to tackle challenges in this complex task, there are still many problems such as the fine-grained characteristics and spatial-temporal discrepancies in surgical videos.

methodsWe propose a contrastive learning-based convolutional recurrent network with multi-level prediction to tackle these problems. Specifically, split-attention blocks are employed to extract spatial features. Through a mapping function in the step-phase branch, the current workflow can be predicted on two mutual-boosting levels. Furthermore, a contrastive branch is introduced to learn the spatial-temporal features that eliminate irrelevant changes in the environment.

resultsWe evaluate our method on the Cataract-101 dataset. The results show that our method achieves an accuracy of 96.37% with only surgical step labels, which outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches.

conclusionThe proposed convolutional recurrent network based on step-phase prediction and contrastive learning can leverage fine-grained characteristics and alleviate spatial-temporal discrepancies to improve the performance of surgical workflow recognition.

Indexed as

LearningNeural Networks, ComputerOperating RoomsWorkflowAlgorithmsFalse Positive ReactionsHumansReproducibility of ResultsContrastive learningSpatial–temporal discrepancySurgical video analysisWorkflow recognition

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.