Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33950370›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Can parental simulation improve neonatal CPR performance? A pilot study.

Rotem Rephaeli, Dalia Gafanovich, Irena Shchors, Giora Weiser

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rotem RephaeliPediatric Emergency Department, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, 12 Bait St., 9103210, Jerusalem, Israel.
Dalia GafanovichThe Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Irena ShchorsNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Giora WeiserPediatric Emergency Department, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, 12 Bait St., 9103210, Jerusalem, Israel. gioraweiser@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8743-5469
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILShaare Zedek Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basic life support training and instruction is recommended for parents of premature infants discharged from the hospital. In order to assess the short-term efficacy of basic life support simulation, in addition to the institutional training, a prospective single-blinded randomized interventional study was performed. The study group received, besides the institutional training, an additional simulation training. The control group had only traditional training. A test assessment was followed approximately a week later and evaluated by two investigators. Fifty parents participated. Nineteen (38%) were in the study group. The study group showed a significant improvement in all the parameters assessed.Conclusion: The addition of a simulation encounter before discharge may improve short-term parental performance of basic life support. What is Known: • Parents of newborns at risk receive institutional training in basic life support. • The retention of knowledge from this training is a point of concern for parents. What is New: • A single simulation encounter for parents improved resuscitation performance. • Simulation for parents may be an important and useful tool to improve the efficacy of basic life support training.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationSimulation TrainingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornParentsPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesCardiopulmonary resuscitationLife supportNeonatalParentalSimulation

Identifiers

PMID33950370
OpenAlexW3159223623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.