Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33950222›Full record

Trial reportBrain : a journal of neurology2021

Motor and cognitive outcomes of cerebello-spinal stimulation in neurodegenerative ataxia.

Alberto Benussi, Valentina Cantoni, Marta Manes, Ilenia Libri, Valentina Dell'Era, Abhishek Datta, Chris Thomas, Camilla Ferrari, Alessio Di Fonzo, Roberto Fancellu and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05621200 (Interventional Cross-over Study to Evaluate the Efficacy on Motor and Cognitive Performance of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05621200 nacompletednot on this map

Interventional Cross-over Study to Evaluate the Efficacy on Motor and Cognitive Performance of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) in Patients With Neurodegenerative Ataxia

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di BresciaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled26ConditionsAtaxia, Spinocerebellar Ataxias, Multiple System Atrophy, Ataxia With Oculomotor ApraxiaArmsTranscranial stimulation over the cerebellar hemispheres
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Treatment of primary adult-onset neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxias.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Alberto BenussiNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25128 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8703-6940
Valentina CantoniNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25128 Brescia, Italy.
Marta ManesNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25128 Brescia, Italy.
Ilenia LibriNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25128 Brescia, Italy.
Valentina Dell'EraNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25128 Brescia, Italy.
Abhishek DattaResearch and Development, Soterix Medical, Inc., New York, NY 10001, USA.
Chris ThomasResearch and Development, Soterix Medical, Inc., New York, NY 10001, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8397-5107
Camilla FerrariDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, 50130 Florence, Italy.
Alessio Di FonzoDino Ferrari Center, Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6478-026X
Roberto FancelluUO Neurologia, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Mario GrassiDepartment of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, Medical and Genomic Statistics Unit, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Alfredo BruscoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8318-7231
Antonella AlbericiNeurology Unit, Department of Neurological and Vision Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili, 25128 Brescia, Italy.
Barbara BorroniNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25128 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9340-9814
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITSoterix Medical (United States) · USUniversity of Brescia · ITAULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar ataxias represent a heterogeneous group of disabling disorders characterized by motor and cognitive disturbances, for which no effective treatment is currently available. In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial, followed by an open-label phase, we investigated whether treatment with cerebello-spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could improve both motor and cognitive symptoms in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia at short and long-term. Sixty-one patients were randomized in two groups for the first controlled phase. At baseline (T0), Group 1 received placebo stimulation (sham tDCS) while Group 2 received anodal cerebellar tDCS and cathodal spinal tDCS (real tDCS) for 5 days/week for 2 weeks (T1), with a 12-week (T2) follow-up (randomized, double-blind, sham controlled phase). At the 12-week follow-up (T2), all patients (Group 1 and Group 2) received a second treatment of anodal cerebellar tDCS and cathodal spinal tDCS (real tDCS) for 5 days/week for 2 weeks, with a 14-week (T3), 24-week (T4), 36-week (T5) and 52-week follow-up (T6) (open-label phase). At each time point, a clinical, neuropsychological and neurophysiological evaluation was performed. Cerebellar-motor cortex connectivity was evaluated using transcranial magnetic stimulation. We observed a significant improvement in all motor scores (scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia, international cooperative ataxia rating scale), in cognition (evaluated with the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale), in quality-of-life scores, in motor cortex excitability and in cerebellar inhibition after real tDCS compared to sham stimulation and compared to baseline (T0), both at short and long-term. We observed an addon-effect after two repeated treatments with real tDCS compared to a single treatment with real tDCS. The improvement at motor and cognitive scores correlated with the restoration of cerebellar inhibition evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Cerebello-spinal tDCS represents a promising therapeutic approach for both motor and cognitive symptoms in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia, a still orphan disorder of any pharmacological intervention.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCerebellumCognitionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor SkillsNeuropsychological TestsSpinal CordSpinocerebellar AtaxiasSpinocerebellar DegenerationsTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTreatment Outcomecerebellar ataxiacerebello-spinal stimulationcognitionmotortranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33950222
OpenAlexW3157254360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.